TV confession that Giuliani bombed WTC7.

PULL.
to tear down, demolish.
-Webster's New World Dictionary

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe
the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to
pull and we watched the building collapse."
-Larry Silverstein, renter of WTC complex who collected $7-billion
insurance claim for 9/11/2001

Controlled Demolitions Inc (CDI bombed over 7,000 structures) and
Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI Jewish garbage cartel) were paid $7-
billion gov't contract to "demolish" WTC and to destroy the evidence
in Communist China and Knoxville, Tennessee. The owners of both CDI
and BFI are from Knoxville, Tennessee, home of former Skull & Bones
mayor Victor "Victoria" Ashe.
http://piratenews.org

September 911 Surprise
http://september911surprise.com

To order a VHS tape of "America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero"
Send a check for $29.95 (shipping and handling included) to:

Great Projects Film Company, Inc.
594 Ninth Avenue, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
1-866 909-3456 or 212 581-1700
http://www.pbs.org/americarebuilds/index.html

===============================================

Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges.

Says "pull it" meant to evacuate firefighters, but there were no
firefighters in the building.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinansw
ers.htm

Paul Joseph Watson | January 5 2006

After nearly two years of steadfast silence, Silverstein Properties
have finally responded to questions about what Larry Silverstein
meant when he told a PBS documentary that WTC Building 7 was "pulled"
in the late afternoon of September 11 2001.

Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade
Center complex. Photos taken minutes before its collapse show small
fires on two or three floors. Building 7 became only the third steel
building in history before or since 9/11 to collapse from fire
damage. The other two were the North and South towers of the World
Trade Center.

Any building that was not owned by Silverstein Properties strangely
remained upright.

Photo and video evidence of the collapse shows classic indications of
a controlled demolition. The standard 'crimp' in the center-left top
of the building and the subsequent 'squibs' of smoke as it collapses
clearly represent explosive demolition.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/281104unmistakablech
arges.htm

Even Dan Rather, commenting on the collapse for CBS News said that
the collapse was, "reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too
much on television before, where a building was deliberately
destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.7.knocked.down.wmv

Click here for Alex Jones' video analysis of the collapse of Building
7.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/180305groundzero.htm

Questions about the highly suspicious nature of the building's
collapse remained comparatively muted until January 2004, when a PBS
documentary, America Rebuilds, originally broadcast in September
2002, received attention across the Internet.

The documentary was made infamous for one comment made by Larry
Silverstein on the subject of 9/11. Silverstein states, "I remember
getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me
that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire,
and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest
thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we
watched the building collapse."

Click here to watch the clip.
http://infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV

We know that the term 'pull it' means to bring the building down by
means of explosives because in the same documentary a cleanup worker
(in December 2001) refers to the demolition of WTC Building 6 when he
says, "...we're getting ready to pull the building six." The term is
industry jargon for planned demolition.

Click here to listen to the clip.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/pullit2.mp3

For the following year and a half the Internet and alternative talk
radio was aflame with talk of Building 7 and Silverstein's apparent
admission. For many it is now the central issue of 9/11.

In June 2005 this website reported Silverstein's only response to
date. It was an ambiguous comment made to New York Post journalist
Sam Smith. Silverstein told Smith that he "meant something else" by
the "pull it" comment but mysteriously refused to elaborate any
further.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/220605silversteinrespond
s.htm

Silverstein Properties have finally provided a detailed explanation
of what Silverstein meant when he said Building 7 was pulled.

The State Department, as part of its pathetic efforts to debunk 9/11
research, has posted the response from Silverstein's spokesperson
Dara McQuillan on its website. It reads as follows.
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Sep/16-241966.html

Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11,
2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks
to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein
Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough
investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center
buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World
Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from
the collapse of WTC Tower 1.

In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire
Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The
Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters
in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein
expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the
safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them
withdraw from the building.

Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of
the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were
lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for
a television documentary he stated, "I said, you know, we've had such
terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it."
Mr. McQuillan has stated that by "it," Mr. Silverstein meant the
contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.

The insurmountable problem with this explanation of Silverstein's
statement is that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7.

Dr. Shyam Sunder, of the National Institutes of Standards and
Technology (NIST), which investigated the collapse of WTC 7, is
quoted in Popular Mechanics (9/11: Debunking the Myths, March, 2005)
as saying: "There was no firefighting in WTC 7."
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?
page=5&c=y
http://piratenews.org/piratenews-under-attack-by-cia.html
http://geocities.com/united_airlines_flight_93

The FEMA report on the collapses, from May, 2002, also says about the
WTC 7 collapse: "no manual firefighting operations were taken by
FDNY."
http://www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm

And an article by James Glanz in the New York Times on November 29,
2001 says about WTC 7: "By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge
of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters
away from it for safety reasons."
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc7/archive/nytimes_112901.html

Some defenders of the official 9/11 story say that the term "pull" is
not demolition lingo for "bring down by controlled demolition".
However, the same PBS video in which Silverstein makes his admission,
contains the following exchange:

(unidentified construction worker): "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready
to pull building six." Luis Mendes, NYC Dept of Design and
Construction: "We had to be very careful how we demolished building
six. We were worried about the building six coming down and then
damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted that particular building to
fall within a certain area."

But even this argument is beside the point. The building's collapse
had all the hallmarks of controlled demolition.

Silverstein's explanation, after two years of stonewalling,
that "pull it" meant to withdraw the firefighters is a lie. There
were no firefighters in the building for hours before the building's
collapse.

So what did Larry Silverstein mean when he stated: "I said, 'You
know, we've had such terrible loss of life, may be the smartest thing
to do is, is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we
watched the building collapse." He could not have meant that they
should "pull" the firefighters from the building because there
weren't any firefighters in the building, at least according to FEMA,
NIST, and Frank Fellini, the Assistant Chief responsible for WTC 7 at
that time. And if he meant "pull the firefighters" then why did he
say "pull it", with no reference to anything other than the building?
The argument that "pull" is not used to mean "demolish" a building is
belied by the other footage in the PBS documentary. And consider the
timing: "they made that decision to pull and then we watched the
building collapse." Could it really be possible that some
(nonexistent) fire brigade was removed from the building and just at
that moment ("then") the building collapsed? Is there really any
doubt here about what Silverstein meant?

The only reasonable conclusion is that Larry Silverstein's statement
is an admission that WTC 7 was brought down by a controlled
demolition, meaning that the official version of what happened to WTC
7 is false, and casting serious doubt on the official story that
terrorists of a foreign origin destroyed the twin towers, as well as
on the rest of the official account of 9/11. Note that this admission
is a statement against Silverstein's own interests (putting him at
odds with the official version of events and potentially jeopardizing
his insurance claims). Such statements are given great weight as a
matter of law.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from
Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein
Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This
building's collapse alone resulted in a profit of about $500 million.

How concerned should we be therefore that Silverstein Properties
bought the lease from MetLife for Chicago's Sears Tower in March 2004?
http://www.realestatejournal.com/propertyreport/newsandtrends/20040312
-starkman.html

The length of time that it took Silverstein to respond to these
charges and the fact that his eventual rebuttal does not correspond
with the facts only gives us more grounds for skepticism.

A real, thorough, impartial, independent investigation of the
collapse of Building 7 needs to take place and if the conclusions of
that investigation are that Building 7 was professionally demolished,
criminal charges need to be brought against those suspected of
involvement.


Related: Professional Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7
http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html

Related: Clips from Alex Jones' Martial Law video which details the
controlled demolition of both Building 7 and the twin towers.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/180305groundzero.htm

Related: Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/051205foundbombs.htm

Related: WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7
http://www.wtc7.net/


===============================================

Pirate News TV
http://piratenews.org

Fair Use per 17 USC 107