http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1260468351
Is there a thread for broadcast history of MLB on the two baseball networks -
ABC & NBC?
Also annoucers for these games?
NBC had Saturday's Game of the Week as well a couple times a year prime time
games.
ABC had Summer games on Monday night and/or Thrusday nights. Also they would
have some Sunday afternoon games especially September games involving teams
fighting for division titles.
I know there is a postseason thread but one for regular season games? Someone
know or is this being work on as we speak. Thanks.
http://ahammshow.blogspot.com/2008/08/bring-back-college-football-on-abc.html
With College Football Season coming up you college football fans you always look
for what channel is playing what game. The top network is ABC and their College
Football brand is a trademark of american sports. About 3 years ago, ABC Sports
went in a different direction and did away with ABC Sports and "renamed" it ESPN
on ABC. Yea, I know I dont get it either. So of course any sport you see on ABC
is really ESPN.
What in the hell is "ESPN on ABC"???? Roone and Howard would not tolerate this..
I honestly believe that the College Football portion has suffered the most from
all of this, I mean look what Disney has turned College Football
into..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN4XXVEDzoE
Remember when Keith Jackson, Brent Musburger and Brad Nessler had that music
behind them, and every game seemed like a conference title matchup. Hell, they
could make Stanford-Oregon State look like the Rose Bowl. Well I'll let you take
a look...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64rs1GXj4ck
http://www.themightymjd.com/2006/08/11/the-wide-world-of-sports-is-now-roughly-t\
he-size-of-bristol-ct/
August 11th, 2006
When you watch a sporting event on ABC from now, it's no longer being presented
to you by "ABC Sports." In fact, that no longer exists. ESPN has swallowed them
whole, and any sporting event that appears on ABC from now on, is being brought
to you by "ESPN on ABC." The Little League World Series will be the last event
eler televised by ABC Sports.
Gone is the organization that brought you "The Wide World of Sports," in favor
of more from the organization that brought you "Bonds on Bonds." Actually, I
suppose it doesn't ultimately make any difference to me. ESPN is probably
omnipresent enough in my life right now, but what are you going to do? It's not
like I can just stop patronizing ESPN. They've got their hooks in me.
Richard Sandomir of the New York Times has done his best to find some
teeth-gnashing and hand-wringing about the event, quoting NBC's Dick Ebersol as
saying that his heart weeps for Roone Aldredge's legacy. Keith Jackson and Dan
Dierdorf were also a little bit pissed, mainly about people's legacies, about
which, to be perfectly honest with you, I could not possibly care less.
ABC's been using ESPN commentators and graphics for a long time now, and I don't
think much actual presentation is going to change. Really, the move is purely
masturbatory on the part of ESPN. George Bodenheimer, president of ESPN, had
some kind of a line about this enabling ABC and ESPN to better serve fans, but
you'll have to forgive me if I'm a little bit skeptical about his altruism. All
the move really does is put get the ESPN brand a little more exposure, which
they probably think is going to help them sell some cell phones.
http://design.osu.edu/carlson/history/ACCAD-overview/overview4b.html
Cranston/Csuri Productions produced over 800 animations for over 400 clients
worldwide. Every major television network, including ABC, CBS, NBC, the Canadian
Broadcasting Co., German ARD Television, ABC Australia, Rede Globo in Brazil,
and the BBC had show openings or promotions produced at CCP.
Cable networks, including HBO, Cinemax, The Turner Broadcasting Network, TNN,
the Country Music Channel, CNN and others did the same.
Sports broadcasts were a specialty, and CCP produced graphics and animation for
CBS Sports, ABC Sports, NBC Sports, ESPN, the NFL, NFL Films, HBO and others.
CCP produced the opening for two Super Bowls, the NCAA Basketball Chamionships,
Major League Baseball, the Breeder's Cup, Wimbledon, College Football and
Basketball, and IROC Racing.
All of the major news shows used CCP graphics, including NBC Nightly News, ABC
World News Tonight, and CBS Evening News. ABC contracted for all 11 of their
major news shows, and also for the United Airlines in-flight broadcast.
Advertisements included Clio nominated TRW pieces, ads for Sony, IBM, Ameritech,
McDonnel Douglas, Jeep, Contac Cold Capsules, Actifed, General Electric, Pert
Plus, Procter and Gamble, Always overnight pads, M&I Banks, Benjamin Moore
Paints, Lowenbrau Beer, Warner Cable, and many others.
Corporate communications were done for GE, IBM, American Electric Power, Mount
Carmel Health, Landor and Associates, Cranston Securities, Cranston Development,
and others.
CCP also specialized in medical animation, producing dozens of sequences for the
BBC series The Body Machine. They produced over 40 segments for the Annenberg
series on Mathematics for PBS. The produced a generic promotional package for
local television markets, customizing it for almost 100 local stations.
They did scene tests for several motion pictures, including Flight of the
Navigator, an unnamed movie from Disney, and the Brave Little Toaster.
The images at the right are examples of the many productions done in the CCP
studios. For a complete list of the CCP clients, click here.
http://design.osu.edu/carlson/history/ACCAD-overview/CCP-Clients.html
http://design.osu.edu/carlson/history/ACCAD-overview/CCP-Clients.html
Cranston/Csuri Clients
1981-1987
Client Location Project Title
ABC Entertainment Los Angeles, CA Love In the Afternoon
ABC Entertainment Los Angeles, CA After School Special
ABC Entertainment Los Angeles, CA Fall Campaign "You'll Love It"
ABC Entertainment Los Angeles, CA Special
ABC Entertainment Los Angeles, CA Good Morning America
ABC News New York, NY In Air Report - United Airlines
ABC News New York, NY One on One
ABC News New York, NY 20/20
ABC News New York, NY World News Tonight
ABC News New York, NY '84 Vote
ABC News New York, NY World News Saturday
ABC News New York, NY Newsbrief
ABC News New York, NY Business Brief
ABC News New York, NY Starfield
ABC News New York, NY World News Tonight Sunday
ABC News New York, NY Sunday
ABC News New York, NY World News This Morning
ABC News New York, NY Weekend Report
ABC News New York, NY Nightline
ABC News New York, NY News Flight - Western Airlines
ABC News New York, NY Sports Update
ABC News New York, NY World News
ABC News New York, NY Special Report
ABC News New York, NY Globe
ABC News New York, NY Weekend News
ABC News New York, NY Directions
ABC Sports New York, NY USFL Promo
ABC Sports New York, NY Olympic Promo
Abelson-Taylor Agency Chicago, IL Syntex
Alcon International Fort Worth TX Eye Animation
American Electric Power (AEP) Columbus OH Corporate Logo
ARD German Television Munich, West Germany Sportschau
ARD German Television Munich, West Germany On Air Package
ARD German Television Munich, West Germany Vochenspiegel
ARD German Television Munich, West Germany Plus-Minus
ARD German Television Munich, West Germany Weltspiegel
Australian Broadcasting Co. Melbourne, Australia ABC Promo Open
Backer & SpielvogeI New York, NY NCR
Benton & Bowles New York NY Proctor & Gamble (Always)
Bernstein-Rein Agency Kansas City, MO Checker Auto Parts (The Wax)
Billy Sunshine New York, NY Caesar's Palace
Box Seat San Diego, CA Promo
Bozell, Jacobs, Kenyon & Eckhardt New York, NY New York Area Chrysler/Plymouth
Dealers
Broadcast Arts New York, NY Clairol
Burroughs Wellcome Research Triangle Park, NC Digibond
Callner-Shapiro Beverly Hills,CA Twisted Sister
Callner-Shapiro Beverly Hills,CA Krokus
Callner-Shapiro Beverly Hills,CA Chaka Khan
Callner-Shapiro Beverly Hills,CA Corporate ID
Canadian Broadcasting Company Toronto, Ontario CBC Network Promotion
CBN Cable Network Virginia Beach,VA 2nd Season Premier
CBN Cable Network Virginia Beach,VA 10th Anniversary Logo
CBS Entertainment Los Angeles, CA Fall Campaign Share the Spirit
CBS News New York, NY CBS Evening News
CBS News New York, NY Sunday Night News
CBS Sports New York, NY Madden Chalkboard
CBS Sports New York, NY Sportsbreak
CBS Sports New York, NY College Football
CBS Sports New York, NY Superbowl XXI
CBS Sports New York, NY IROC
CBS Sports New York, NY 1987 NCAA Basketball Championships
CBS Sports New York, NY CBS Sports Tag
CBS Sports New York, NY NFL Live
CBS Sports New York, NY Superbowl XVIII
CBS Sports New York NY 1985 NCAA Championships
Ciba Geigy Summit, NJ Lopressor, Circle of Protection
CJCH Halifax, Nova Scotia Atlantic Television System
CKTM Trois-Rivieres, Quebec Television Saint-Maurice
CKTV Regina, Saskatchewan
Consortium for Mathematics Applications Lexington, MA VISUMAP Telecourse
Graphics
Costello & Associates Columbus, OH The Great North Stores
Cowles & Company Green Ridge, NJ ABC Affiliates Package
Cranston Securities Columbus, OH The Louisville Project
Cunningham & Walsh New York, NY Puffs Plus
Dancer Fitzgerald and Sample Agency New York, NY Proctor & Gamble ("Encaprin")
DHS Films New York NY E. F. Hutton
Dunhaven Entertainment Culver City,CA Flight of the Navigator
EDS-Saturn Southfield,MI Gear Animation
ER Squibb & Sons Princeton NJ Logo Open
ESPN Bristol, CT College Basketball
ESPN Bristol, CT Auto Racing Open
ESPN Bristol, CT Basketball Open
ESPN Bristol CT Rendezvous 87
ESPN Bristol CT Speedweek
ESPN Bristol CT CFA College Football
ESPN Bristol CT NHL Hockey
ESPN Bristol CT Speedworld
Evening Magazine San Francisco, CA Show Open
E. F. Hutton New York NY Corporate logo
Fahlgren & Swink Agency Toledo, OH Toledo Trust
Fahlgren & Swink Agency Toledo, OH Microchip
Fahlgren & Swink Agency Toledo, OH Trustcorp
Fahlgren & Swink Agency Toledo, OH Cincinnati Bell
Fox Broadcasting Los Angeles CA Fox Network Identity
Glazen Advertising Cleveland, OH Diamonds
Globo Television Rio de Janeiro, Brazil World Cup Soccer
Globo Television Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20th Anniversary Logo
Goldcrest Multimedia London, England The Body Machine
Grey Advertising New York, NY Bristol Myers (Nuprin)
Griswold Eshelman & Company Columbus, Oh AEP Logo
Group 243 Design Ann Arbor, MI Domino's Pizza
HAL Publications New York, NY Before You Buy
Hameroff/Milenthal Columbus, OH Ohio Department of Development
(The Heart of it All)
Handley and Miller Indianapolis, IN Indiana Bell World Games
HBO Cinemax New York, NY Network Promo Campaign
HKTVB Kowloon Hong Kong Television Broadcast Limited
Hoffman, York & Compton Milwaukee, WI Milwaukee Art Museum Vase in Hall
Home Box Office New York, NY Inside the NFL
Home Box Office New York, NY Wimbledon
Home Box Office New York, NY World Championship boxing
ICN Pharmaceuticals Costa Mesa, CA Logo
Image West Studio City, CA ABC World Series Open
Jacobs & Gerber and California Films Los Angeles, CA Cox Broadcasting Station
Network Identity
Japan Computer Graphics Lab Tokyo, Japan The Brain
J. Walter Thompson Chicago, IL Ameritech Corporate ID
J. Walter Thompson Chicago, IL Lowenbrau
J. Walter Thompson San Francisco, CA The Bay Cable Group
Kilpatrick Headley-Noble Miami, FL American Savings Bank
Kirchner, Helton & Collet Dayton, OH Huntington National Bank -Union Commerce
Kirchner, Helton & Collet Dayton, OH Huntington National Bank - Home Computer
Service
KABC Hollywood, CA
KBHK San Francisco, CA
KBVO Austin, TX
KCCI Des Moines IA
KCNC Denver, CO
KCOP Los Angeles, CA
KCRA Sacramento, CA News Open
KCTV Kansas City, MO
KDFI Dallas, TX
KDFW Dallas, TX
KDNW Seattle WA
KFVS Cape Girardeau, MO
KJTV Amarillo TX
KMSP Indianapolis, IN
KOVR Sacramento CA
KPTV Portland, OR
KREB Las Vegas, NV
KRZB Hot Springs AR
KSNW Wichita, KS
KTBC Austin, TX
KTHT Houston, TX
KTSP Phoenix, AZ
KTUL Tulsa, OK
KTVI St. Louis MO
KTVI Fort Worth TX
KTVU Oakland CA
KTVX Salt Lake City, UT
KTXA Dallas, TX
KTXH Houston, TX
KUPT Phoenix AZ
KUTV Salt Lake City, UT
KVTV Laredo, TX
KWWL Waterloo, IA
KXAS Fort Worth, TX
KXXV Waco TX
Landor and Associates San Francisco, CA Corporate Open
Laser Disc Technologies Toronto, Ontario Scanner
Leo Burnett Chicago, IL Proctor & Gamble (Pert Plus)
Lofaro & Associates New York, NY General Electric (Prism)
Lofaro & Associates New York, NY Sony XBR Campaign
Lord,Geller, Federico & Einstein New York, NY IBM Christmas Carol
Lord,Geller, Federico & Einstein New York, NY IBM Christopher Columbus
Los Angeles Express Football Los Angeles CA Promo
Marcus Advertising Cleveland, OH The Ohio Lottery Commission Super Lotto
("Numbers")
Marcus Advertising Cleveland, OH The Ohio Lottery Commission
Marshall & Ilsley Banks Milwaukee WI M & I Banks
McCall/Coppola Studio City, CA Clairol (Kindness)
McCall/Coppola Studio City, CA Like Cola
McNeill Laboratories Springhouse, PA Logo Design
Messina Editorial New York, NY Macy's/Bamberger's
Metromedia Producers Corporation Boston, MA Logo
Metromedia Producers Corporation Boston, MA Healthbeat
Mount Carmel Health Columbus, OH Commercial ("PCTA")
Mount Carmel Health Columbus, OH Commercial ("Alzheimers")
Mount Carmel Health Columbus, OH Commercial ("Trauma")
Murcia of Travel & Tourism Murcia, Spain Promo
Nashville Network Nashville, TN Network Logo
NBC Sports New York, NY 1984 AFC Championships
NBC Sports New York, NY 1985 AFC Championships
NBC Sports New York, NY 1986 AFC Championships
NBC Sports New York, NY Sportsworld
NBC Sports New York, NY Lombardi Trophy (1985)
NBC Sports New York, NY Lombardi Trophy (1986)
NBC Sports New York, NY NFL Shield
NBC Sports New York, NY NFL 84
NBC Sports New York, NY NFL 85
NBC Sports New York, NY NFL 86
NBC Sports New York, NY Breeders Cup (1985)
NBC Sports New York, NY Breeders Cup (1986)
NBC Sports New York, NY Superbowl XX
NBC Sports New York, NY PBA Bowling Open (1985)
NBC Sports New York, NY PBA Bowling Open (1986)
NBC Sports New York, NY Tennis Open (1985)
NBC Sports New York, NY Tennis Open (1986)
NBC Sports New York, NY NFL on NBC
NBC Sports New York, NY On Air Promotion Package (1985)
NBC Sports New York, NY On Air Promotion Package (1986)
NBC Sports New York, NY Major League Baseball Open (1985)
NBC Sports New York, NY Major League Baseball Open (1986)
NFL Films Mount Laurel, NJ Film Open
N.Y. Ayer New York, NY Carrier Corporation
Ohio Edison Company Akron OH Talking Sphere
Ohio Film Board Columbus, OH Catalog Cover
Ohlmeyer Communications New York, NY Strohs Brewing Company
Ohlmeyer Communications New York NY Nabisco Fit Tips Ad
Olgivy & Mather Los Angeles, CA Contac (Design)
Olgivy & Mather New York NY California Federal Savings & Loan
Paramount Television Los Angeles, CA Solid Gold Show Open
PM Magazine San Francisco Show Open
Praxis Film Works North Hollywood, CA McDonnell Douglas
Price Weber Marketing Comm. Louisville, KY Cummins Engine
Private Music Alexandria, VA Gear Series
Public Broadcasting Service New York, NY Network Campaign
Republican Party Washington, DC 1984 National Convention Open
Robinson, Lambi-Nairn Ltd. London, England Scottish Television Network
Ron Foth Retail Columbus,OH Lazarus Christmas Open
Rumrill-Hoyt Advertising Southfield MI Actifed
Saatchi & Saatchi Compton Columbus, OH Jeep/Renault
Salvato & Coe Associates New York, NY Huntington National Bank Annual Report
Sheryl Gold Communications LA 1986 CBS Affiliates Package
Showtime New York, NY The Heat is On
Showtime New York, NY Exclusive Presentation
Studio EFX Hollywood, CA Turner Broadcasting Goodwill Games
Tailford & Associates Toledo, OH Toledo Hospital
Ted Thomas Associates Philadelphia, PA Rorer Pharmaceuticals Nitroglycerine
Vision Associates New York, NY Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Silent Ischemia
WABC New York, NY New York, NY
Warwick Advertising New York, NY Benjamin Moore Paints
Warwick Advertising New York, NY Midol 200
William Esty New York, NY Energizer
WBAY Green Bay WI Station Identification
WBBM Chicago, IL Station Identification
WBFS Chicago, IL Station Identification
WBOY Clarksburg, WV Station Identification
WCAU Philadelphia, PA Station Identification
WCBS New York, NY Station Identification
WCFC Chicago, IL Grant Broadcasting Promotions
WCMH Columbus, OH Station Identification
WCVB Boston, MA Station Identification
WDAF Kansas City MO Station Identification
WDIV Detroit, MI Station Identification
WDLI Canton, OH Station Identification
WDVM Minneapolis, MN Station Identification
WDZL Miami, FL Station Identification
WEVU Naples, FL Station Identification
WFLD Chicago, IL Station Identification
WFTV Orlando, FL Station Identification
WFTV Orlando, FL Station Identification
WGBO Joliet, IL Station Identification
WGBS Philadelphia, PA Grant Broadcasting Promotions
WHEC Rochester, NY Station Identification
WHIZ Zanesville, OH Station Identification
WISN Milwaukee, WI Hearst Corporation
WJLA Washington, DC Station Identification
WJW Cleveland, OH Station Identification
WJZ Baltimore ,MD For Kid's Sake - People are Talking
WKAQ San Juan, Puerto Rico Station Identification
WKBD Southfield,MI
WKYC Cleveland OH
WLFI Lafayette IN
WLNE New Bedford MA
WLS Chicago, IL
WMAQ Chicago, IL
WMC Memphis TN
WNBC New York NY
WNEW New York, NY
WNYT Albany, NY
WOR Secaucus, NJ
WPEC West Palm Beach, FL
WPTF Raleigh NC Price/McNabb
WQED Pittsburgh, PA
WRAL Raleigh, NC Wonderworks
WRGB Schenectady, NY Spiekerman Media
WRTV Indianapolis, IN
WSJ
WTAF Pittsburgh PA
WTAT Charleston, SC
WTBS Atlanta GA Turner Broadcasting
WTTG Washington, DC Metromedia
WTTV Bloomington, IN
WTVJ Miami. FL
WTVS Detroit, MI
WUSA Washington, DC
WVAH Charleston WV
WVIA Pittston, PA
WVTM Birmingham., AL
WWL New Orleans LA Nettenshein Marketing for Media
WXIA Atlanta, GA Gannett Broadcasting
WXNE Boston, MA Chicago, IL
WXRT FM Diamonds
WXXV Golfport, MS
Wunderman, Ricotta, and Klein New York, NY CBS Video Games
Wyse Advertising Cleveland, OH TRW -The Best Idea in the World
Wyse Advertising Cleveland, OH TRW - Kaleidoscope
Zooma Films / Teitsell Films Venice, CA NBC 1983 Fall Campaign
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1260027561
Here it is:
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1260078760
Any thoughts of pre-1966 threads on the subject??
I know c.1955 or so thru 1959 NCAA football was on NBC with Lindsey Nelson and
Red Grange as the top team, then a whirlwind of rightsholders followed.
1960-1961 on ABC with Curt Gowdy and Paul Christman the main team, 1962-1963 on
CBS with Lindsey Nelson and Terry Brennan the A team, Nelson and Brennan then
moved to NBC when they had the rights for 1964 and 1965.
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1217315040/75
"Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedules (Read 4531 times)
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #75 - 12/03/09 at 20:59:32
Quote from onairb2 on 01/02/09 at 15:13:13:
I just thank God they had an out clause...somewhere exists an alternate universe
where there was no strike, and America suffered through the full six years of
that contract!
The only thing that makes me wish they'd come up with a decent version of the
concept, like for instance having a regular Saturday GOTW to *complement* a
Baseball Night In America and no regionalization of postseason games, is that we
would have gotten six years of Al Michaels back doing baseball and would have
been spared Fox baseball coverage.
Back to top
IP Logged
onairb2
God Member
Posts: 1281
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #76 - 12/04/09 at 03:25:17
I actually would have preferred to see 'TBN' follow the Fox blueprint of only 3
or maybe 4 good games being regionalized each week; perhaps one game for each
of the Eastern, Central and Pacific time zones(with the Mountain getting the
Rockies),and with more of the name announcers who actually worked for the
networks, rather than most of the hybrid local announcing teams.
NBC could have had a no-brainer selection of Costas, Enberg, Gumbel, and even
Charlie Jones(already working for the Rockies at the time); and if Vin and/or
Joe G and/or Tony K wanted to do a game once in a while, they could have had an
open invitation.
ABC could have easily used Al, Tim, and Jim for the primary, Musburger for the B
game, and imported either Miller and Morgan or Gary Thorne for anything else.
None of this DeWayne Staats, Larry Dieker, Pete Van Wieren, etc., pretending to
work for some non-existent 'network/flawed marketing tool of MLB.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #77 - 12/04/09 at 10:07:50
The Fox blueprint for Saturdays has been terrible from the beginning IMO. It
has meant that for 13 straight years there has never been any diversity to what
someone sees, he just *always* from week to week sees the same team he watches
on a daily basis with unfamiliar announcers and thus the Saturday game is no
longer the spotlight for different teams the way NBC did it, and ABC in
primetime.
I hope to goodness that MLB finally puts an end to this idiotic Fox exclusivity
that has ruined national baseball coverage for more than a decade now. MLB
is a sport that *has* to be a two network sport, and by that I mean two major
network sport like in the NBC/ABC days or the FOX/NBC days. The NFL I think
has alawys been able to prosper as a TV sport precisely because with
multi-networks, NFL coverage has never had a boring one-note quality to it.
FOX's approach though has been one-note since 1996 and it's never gotten any
better.
Back to top
IP Logged
JohnnyO
God Member
Posts: 836
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #78 - 12/04/09 at 10:41:44
The NFL includes ALL of its games in national TV contracts, which is unique to
all team sports in the USA, and makes comparisons to other sports like MLB
difficult.
Back to top
IP Logged
Michael Green
Full Member
Posts: 209
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #79 - 12/04/09 at 12:59:26
Quote from JohnnyO on 12/04/09 at 10:41:44:
The NFL includes ALL of its games in national TV contracts, which is unique to
all team sports in the USA, and makes comparisons to other sports like MLB
difficult.
Also, playing 16 games in a season as opposed to the 162 in baseball and the 82
in basketball. As I understand it, hockey has no regular season but starts with
the playoffs.
More seriously, I have thought one of Fox's bigger mistakes is lack of
continuity. When NBC's Game of the Week was at its peak in the 1980s, I think
people wanted to tune in to hear Vin and Joe or Bob and Tony talk baseball.
Now, when you get ready for a Saturday game, it's no longer the GAME of the week
but one of the regional games of the week, you probably have already seen the
team several times in the past week, and you could get almost anybody announcing
it.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #80 - 12/04/09 at 16:14:43
Yes, but if the NFL were carried by only one network exclusively spread out
among different announcers for the same network, I think there'd at some point
be a creeping annoyance with the coverage based on lack of diverse approaches.
Growing up, no matter who was doing it, there was a distinct *style* to a CBS
game as opposed to an NBC or ABC game etc. and when baseball was done by NBC and
ABC you had that special air of distinction too that more importantly helped
baseball attract a much bigger national following IMO. But starting with
the disastrous CBS exclusive contract of 90-93 and then with FOX as exclusive
carrier since 2001 the problem with national baseball coverage is that's its
always taken on a stale homogenized air (and the less said about ESPN with their
awful flagship team of Miller and Morgan, the better.) At least when NBC had
half the postseason from 96-00 there was diversity of broadcast presentation as
NBC production values still represented the old days of NBC baseball in the 80s.
Back to top
IP Logged
JP
YaBB Administrator
Posts: 2683
Gender:
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #81 - 12/04/09 at 16:23:22
How can you say that? It's not like FOX is the only network that broadcasts MLB.
There's also ESPN, TBS, and a large number of regional networks, all of them
with their own style and approach.
Back to top
J.P. Kirby
NFL TV Distribution Maps webmaster
IP Logged
Red Dog
God Member
Posts: 1160
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #82 - 12/04/09 at 16:31:30
I don't see why having 2 OTA carriers (with different styles and such) is
necessarily going to drum up a bigger national following than 1. For years when
baseball was still the national pastime, NBC was the exclusive national OTA
carrier.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #83 - 12/04/09 at 16:56:25
Actually, the 1966-75 NBC era of exclusivity is the period when baseball's
decline started. Before 1966, baseball had national exposure on all three
networks during the regular season with Dizzy Dean's CBS game of the week
attracting a big following in markets that didn't have major league teams.
When you have multiple OTA networks interested in making their coverage
different and also with a broader vested interest in promoting the net effect is
usually a lot better.
Back to top
IP Logged
Red Dog
God Member
Posts: 1160
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #84 - 12/04/09 at 17:12:03
There's nothing special about OTA carriage these days. 20+ years ago, sure, it
was special. As has been said, there are 2 other national platforms (with high
penetration rates) that MLB is available on (not to mention that RSNs cover
every other game). If anything, there is more diversity of coverage now more
than ever.
We're probably within a decade of the World Series being on ESPN anyhow.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #85 - 12/04/09 at 17:18:31
Diversity does not exist when I've been having to listen to the subpar work of
Joe Buck for 13 years and the atrocious work of Jon Miller-Joe Morgan as the
national cable voice for twenty years while the two men who should have been
calling baseball on the national level for the last twenty years, Bob Costas and
Al Michaels, were forced out of the game due to the shortsightedness of who
baseball chose to deal with.
Cable exposure has never been the same for me as the presence generated on an
OTA network, and the very fact that baseball started palming off its postseason
games to cable channels only has further conveyed the aura of a sport that has
accepted a second class status it never had to have.
Back to top
IP Logged
Red Dog
God Member
Posts: 1160
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #86 - 12/05/09 at 13:55:46
Sounds like announcers are more of your problem than the carriers.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #87 - 12/05/09 at 14:04:21
They're related issues IMO. A sport that decides to contract itself from a
two OTA network sport and is eventually willing to accept the majority of its
postseason games on cable is a sport that has decided to relegate itself to a
second class status. Peter Ueberroth alas sent baseball down that slippery
slope starting with the 1990 CBS contract and it's been bad for baseball ever
since.
It doesn't help that the announcing quality of ESPN and FOX (and TBS for that
matter) has been abysmal.
Back to top
IP Logged
Red Dog
God Member
Posts: 1160
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #88 - 12/05/09 at 14:09:56
It already was 2nd class to football. And the OTA carriers besides FOX have
obviously concluded that the benefits weren't and aren't worth the costs. FOX
is probably going to come to that conclusion when the next set of rights come
up. I don't see how baseball is the one driving this 'contraction' from OTA
coverage. I suppose they did in 1990, but that's not what's happening now. But
also keep in mind in 1990, FOX wasn't a major player, NBC had already decided to
devote major resources to the NBA and Olympics so they were pretty much out, and
that left ABC and CBS. ABC at the time was rolling back on their sports budget.
CBS threw a fortune at MLB, but regardless, I'm not sure MLB had more options
than CBS.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #89 - 12/05/09 at 14:18:38
2001 and 2006 when they reupped with FOX as the sole OTA carrier demonstrated
that baseball hadn't learned a thing from the CBS debacle of 1990. I don't
think in either of those instances it was a case of FOX being the only OTA
network that wanted to do baseball.
It is not true BTW, that NBC wanted out of baseball back in 1988 when they were
shut out of the deal (the CBS deal *predates* NBC getting the NBA from them)
ABC was suffering more from red ink as a result of the Calgary Olympics, but NBC
had always been proud of its tradition as the network that introduced TV
baseball and would have been happy to be part of a deal with CBS where the GOTW
still existed. CBS overpaid to be the *sole* network for one reason only, so
they could hog all levels of the postseason to promote primetime programming and
Ueberroth in the process not only sold out NBC, the network that always enjoyed
doing the game, but he also sold out baseball's ability to be on-par with the
NFL on a TV level (and certainly always ahead of the other sports, which were
always going to be one network sports).
Back to top
IP Logged
Red Dog
God Member
Posts: 1160
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #90 - 12/05/09 at 14:24:30
Quote from epaddon on 12/05/09 at 14:18:38:
2001 and 2006 when they reupped with FOX as the sole OTA carrier demonstrated
that baseball hadn't learned a thing from the CBS debacle of 1990. I don't
think in either of those instances it was a case of FOX being the only OTA
network that wanted to do baseball.
For the price MLB was seeking, they certainly were. I don't remember the other
networks banging on MLB's door to broadcast MLB. They have other priorities -
mainly revolving around the NFL and Olympics. ABC has very little interest in
sports anymore (besides what ESPN feeds it on weekends).
Back to top
IP Logged
DK073
God Member
Posts: 2230
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #91 - 12/05/09 at 20:34:19
Quote from epaddon on 12/05/09 at 14:18:38:
2001 and 2006 when they reupped with FOX as the sole OTA carrier demonstrated
that baseball hadn't learned a thing from the CBS debacle of 1990. I don't
think in either of those instances it was a case of FOX being the only OTA
network that wanted to do baseball.
You may have had a case pre-strike, but not anymore. It's not that baseball
only wants 1 OTA carrier now, but CBS isn't interested, NBC wants no part of it,
and ABC doesn't have a sports division anymore. Signing up with TBS in 2006
wasn't so much a choice as it was a lack of option. You can rip the NBA for
making the decision to move more towards cable and they really left NBC out to
dry. If there was a 2nd OTA network that wanted in on the action, MLB would
have considered them. But TBS put the most money on the table when there wasn't
a lot of competition, so there wasn't much MLB could do.
Back to top
IP Logged
wdoodlesonII
God Member
Posts: 2577
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #92 - Yesterday at 00:53:57
Quote from epaddon on 12/05/09 at 14:18:38:
CBS overpaid to be the *sole* network for one reason only, so they could hog
all levels of the postseason to promote primetime programming
CBS supposedly would have overpaid even more- had MLB agreed to interleague play
at that time
Back to top
IP Logged
onairb2
God Member
Posts: 1281
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #93 - Yesterday at 03:19:01
That wasn't the last time CBS expressed interest in interleague games; after the
'Baseball Network' deal was terminated,and just before Fox and NBC (for
postseason games) emerged with the rights, there were initial reports that CBS
would have a Thursday night package of West Coast interleague games starting in
'96, mostly scheduled for late night(11:30 ET/8:30 PT). This proposal never got
off the ground, most likely because of the timing( I guess the '96 schedule had
already been announced, and it would have been too costly to redo it, the games
would have had even later starts than the TBN West Coast games, and CBS wouldn't
have wanted to pre-empt Letterman), though I remember KNBR radio in San
Francisco reporting it as a done deal..but I think the Fox/NBC deal was
announced the same day, and CBS and baseball haven't been mentioned in the same
sentence ever since...except on the506.
Back to top
IP Logged
Michael Green
Full Member
Posts: 209
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #94 - Yesterday at 13:08:38
A few points I'd like to add.
1. I don't blame CBS for that contract (1990-93). Peter Ueberroth was behind
that. Supposedly, even if he had gone with NBC, he no longer wanted the Game of
the Week, and he did hold the post-season hostage to get bigger money,
especially since NBC and ABC had overpaid for the previous deal.
2. I note that Al Michaels was in the employ of ABC when it merged with ESPN.
I also note that he did not attempt to do baseball. Bob Costas pooh-poohed
doing play-by-play as well. If they really wanted it, they could have done
something about it, even going the Dick Enberg route of joining a local team.
It isn't as though they would have wound up panhandling. That doesn't mean I
expected them to do that, but to say they had no chance to do baseball just
doesn't fly.
3. The only baseball broadcaster I hear today who even comes close to Vin
Scully--to the point that he would be allowed to touch Vin's briefcase, but not
necessarily carry it--is Jon Miller. It saddens me that the country thinks of
him mainly as the pbp man next to Joe Morgan and, for a horrific year, Steve
Phillips. He is a tremendous baseball broadcaster on the radio. But he has
been stuck with a poor analyst for 20 seasons and with a network that is more
interested in itself than in anything else.
It reminds me of the story about Curt Gowdy. He would go to the production
meeting before the Game of the Week, and the producer would natter on about the
"show" and the opening and all that. Tony Kubek said Gowdy would raise his hand
and, with affected naivete, say, "What about the game?" I wait for ESPN to
think that way.
4. I agree that the decade in which NBC was the only network outlet and Curt
Gowdy the only pbp man hurt baseball--no offense to its excellent production and
Gowdy's abilities, but as Bud Blattner once said, you could have God on the air
and the public would eventually get tired of HIM! Remember that it wasn't only
Dizzy Dean and CBS, but NBC did a game, first with Lindsey Nelson and then with
Bob Wolff--in other words, great announcers. And in the 1950s and early 1960s,
it was the peak of the local radio guys, so there was a lot more to enjoy in the
broadcasts. Now, with every team required to have an "analyst" who tells you
nothing and an entire roster for radio, TV and cable, it's no wonder the
broadcasts don't sing the way they used to.
Back to top
IP Logged
DK073
God Member
Posts: 2230
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #95 - Yesterday at 14:34:54
Quote from onairb2 on Yesterday at 03:19:01:
That wasn't the last time CBS expressed interest in interleague games; after the
'Baseball Network' deal was terminated,and just before Fox and NBC (for
postseason games) emerged with the rights, there were initial reports that CBS
would have a Thursday night package of West Coast interleague games starting in
'96, mostly scheduled for late night(11:30 ET/8:30 PT). This proposal never got
off the ground, most likely because of the timing( I guess the '96 schedule had
already been announced, and it would have been too costly to redo it, the games
would have had even later starts than the TBN West Coast games, and CBS wouldn't
have wanted to pre-empt Letterman), though I remember KNBR radio in San
Francisco reporting it as a done deal..but I think the Fox/NBC deal was
announced the same day, and CBS and baseball haven't been mentioned in the same
sentence ever since...except on the506.
I'm sorry, but I have to say it.. who made those reports, Wallyhorse? That
sounds like exactly the type of thing he would try for.
Back to top
IP Logged
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #96 - Yesterday at 15:35:28
Quote from Michael Green on Yesterday at 13:08:38:
A few points I'd like to add.
1. I don't blame CBS for that contract (1990-93). Peter Ueberroth was behind
that. Supposedly, even if he had gone with NBC, he no longer wanted the Game of
the Week, and he did hold the post-season hostage to get bigger money,
especially since NBC and ABC had overpaid for the previous deal.
No argument. Ueberroth deserves the blame for that, and combined with his
being the architect of collusion that makes him the worst commissioner of the
modern era, bar none. Bud Selig at least has more things he can take credit
for. For Ueberroth to not recognize the value of the GOTW shows how clueless
an individual he was.
Quote from Michael Green on Yesterday at 13:08:38:
2. I note that Al Michaels was in the employ of ABC when it merged with ESPN.
I also note that he did not attempt to do baseball. Bob Costas pooh-poohed
doing play-by-play as well. If they really wanted it, they could have done
something about it, even going the Dick Enberg route of joining a local team.
It isn't as though they would have wound up panhandling. That doesn't mean I
expected them to do that, but to say they had no chance to do baseball just
doesn't fly.
When you're overloaded with assignments for the network, I seriously doubt
that's going to give you incentive to then decide you're going to do assignments
for the cable channel. Costas, I would note, *constantly* complained about
the loss of baseball for NBC on-air, arguing with Bill Parcells on-set on NFL
Live one night about what to watch when Game 7 of the 91 WS competed against
Giants-Redskins. And the fact that he's now willing to do the occasional
PBP game for MLB Network I think speaks volumes to how much his regard for the
game remains. My point is that Costas and Michaels should have been the
primary *network* voices of baseball through the 90s and 00s. Instead, we got
Jack Buck (not suited for TV), Sean McDonough (competent but bland) and Joe
Buck.
Quote from Michael Green on Yesterday at 13:08:38:
3. The only baseball broadcaster I hear today who even comes close to Vin
Scully--to the point that he would be allowed to touch Vin's briefcase, but not
necessarily carry it--is Jon Miller. It saddens me that the country thinks of
him mainly as the pbp man next to Joe Morgan and, for a horrific year, Steve
Phillips. He is a tremendous baseball broadcaster on the radio. But he has
been stuck with a poor analyst for 20 seasons and with a network that is more
interested in itself than in anything else.
Whatever virtues Miller has as a radio broadcaster must evidently be confined to
the local market, because on those occasions where I have heard him doing the
World Series on ESPN Radio he has been just as impossible a listen as he is for
me on TV. One year (approximately 2002 I think), I heard him lapsing into a
TV style of PBP where the description of what happened on-field came after the
play happened because he was wasting time making some other point that he didn't
want to break away from.
Back to top
IP Logged
Motown Mike
Senior Member
Posts: 293
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #97 - Yesterday at 17:35:30
Quote from Michael Green on Yesterday at 13:08:38:
2. I note that Al Michaels was in the employ of ABC when it merged with ESPN.
I also note that he did not attempt to do baseball.
Actually, Michaels did try to get out of his ABC contract in 1990 so he could
jump to CBS and do baseball (and, presumably, be their #2 NFL guy behind
Summerall), but ABC wouldn't let him go. As for calling games on ESPN, you know
he's never considered himself a "cable guy".
Quote:
3. The only baseball broadcaster I hear today who even comes close to Vin
Scully--to the point that he would be allowed to touch Vin's briefcase, but not
necessarily carry it--is Jon Miller. It saddens me that the country thinks of
him mainly as the pbp man next to Joe Morgan and, for a horrific year, Steve
Phillips. He is a tremendous baseball broadcaster on the radio. But he has been
stuck with a poor analyst for 20 seasons and with a network that is more
interested in itself than in anything else.
Even beyond that, I think doing baseball nationally is an inherently thankless
job, given the parochialism of the game's fans and the inevitable comparison
with beloved local TV and radio announcers. Even Scully, Michaels, Costas,
Gowdy, etc. - while retrospectively held up as exemplars of baseball
broadcasting in comparison with the Joe Bucks and Chip Carays of today - got
plenty of criticism back in the day for real or imagined biases, and for not
being as knowledgable about the teams their networks broadcast as those teams'
local announcers were. It just seems to go with the territory.
I share your admiration of Miller's radio work, though. His Giants broadcasts
with Dave Flemming are an absolute pleasure to hear, and unlike epaddon I think
he's always done a fine job of "painting the word picture" and keeping Morgan on
a short leash on their World Series radiocasts.
Back to top
IP Logged
garretta
God Member
Posts: 1013
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #98 - Yesterday at 18:40:23
If Al truly wanted to broadcast baseball, he would have done games on ESPN,
period. Or he would have done what Costas did and do some games for MLB Network
when there was no SNF conflict. For that matter, he had the chance to launch the
NFL Network's package and chose not to do that, either. (Don't know how long he
would have wanted to do two games a week, but he could have tried it for a year
and seen if it was possible; if not, we'd probably have Papa or someone like him
just like we do now.) He just wants to be a network broadcaster; doesn't matter
the sport or the network. Oh, except for that stupid college football stuff; he
wouldn't soil his hands with such as that.
To his credit, he claims not to miss baseball anymore; at least we don't have to
hear him whine about not doing the sport when he's had multiple opportunities
since ABC left the air for baseball for the lasst time in '96 and didn't pursue
one of them.
Back to top
IP Logged
Stockpile
Senior Member
Posts: 345
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #99 - Yesterday at 22:40:47
If Michaels really wanted to do baseball, he could have on ESPN. ABC was
already partners with ESPN in 1990 and ESPN had a ton of baseball inventory.
Single games on Sunday, Monday or Tuesday. DH on Wednesday and Fridays. All
but the Sunday Night games had a backup game, which would be seen if a game got
over early, rain delay or got interesting. Houston at LA was an A game, on a
Friday in April 1990 but the 9th Inning of Seattle at Oakland (B game) was seen
due to Seattle's Brian Holman in pursuit of a perfect game. ESPN had the
inventory and would have loved to schedule Michaels but he doesn't due cable and
has hitched his broadcasting voice to the NFL.
Back to top
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1217315040/100
"Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedules (Read 4532 times)
epaddon
YaBB Newbie
Posts: 19
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #100 - Yesterday at 23:59:29
In fairness to Michaels, hitching himself to ESPN in 1990 would have also meant
being locked out of doing postseason baseball, and I'm sure that Michaels would
have been happy to find a way of doing baseball *if* it could also mean the
chance to do another World Series (hence the reason why he did make an attempt
in 1990 to bolt to CBS, which at the time knew they were in trouble right out
of the gate on baseball with prospective #1 voice Brent Musburger getting canned
ten days before the season started, and Jack Buck not clicking well with
McCarver at all).
Back to top
IP Logged
wdoodlesonII
God Member
Posts: 2577
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #101 - Today at 01:36:05
Quote from Stockpile on Yesterday at 22:40:47:
If Michaels really wanted to do baseball, he could have on ESPN. ABC was
already partners with ESPN in 1990 and ESPN had a ton of baseball inventory.
Recall ESPN and ABC Sports were still separately operated until about 1998 or
so- most joint programming before thatwas constituted of time-buys on ABC by
ESPN- the early 90's NHL games were among these- and the crossover of
announcers between the 2 did not become common practice until a few years after
that
Back to top
IP Logged
Michael Green
Full Member
Posts: 209
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #102 - Today at 01:56:42
Agreed and granted. But if Costas or Michaels really wanted to do baseball,
they would have found a way to do it, even at the local level. I am not
faulting them, but when they started rhapsodizing about their love for the game,
I get a little itchy.
Back to top
IP Logged
wdoodlesonII
God Member
Posts: 2577
Re: "Baseball Night in America" on ABC/NBC Schedul
Reply #103 - Today at 03:06:30
Quote from Michael Green on Today at 01:56:42:
Agreed and granted. But if Costas or Michaels really wanted to do baseball,
they would have found a way to do it, even at the local level. I am not
faulting them, but when they started rhapsodizing about their love for the game,
I get a little itchy.
Costas did turn down ESPN and a baseball role there in 2002 to remain at HBO
Back to top
--- In ABC_Sports_Tribute_Page@yahoogroups.com, "Terrence C" <tmc_6882part2@...>
wrote:
>
> http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1242143625/25#25
>
> Quote from ZenoZone on 10/23/09 at 12:47:10:
> Another interesting tidbit from the 1971-1985 Indy 500 tape delayed
broadcasts...
>
> The commentary was done live for the pre-race, the start, and about the first
5-10 laps. Then they'd cut to commercial. At that point, the broadcast was
recorded without commentary. Depending upon the competitiveness of the race, the
producers would put the commentators back in the booth for about the last 10
laps. That way the call of the finish would be "spontaneous."
>
> The rest of the commentary was done after-the-fact in post-production. So in
essence, the commentators already knew who won when they were calling segments
of the race! The segments were edited and pieced together. Usually they'd skip
huge portions of the race and cut to pre-recorded "personal" segments. A race
which took 3.5 hours (not including pre and post race) was squeezed into a 2 or
3 hour time slot.
>
>
>
> And there is a strong case to be made that this style of broadcasting in which
the commentary was all after-the-fact was the direct cause of the 1981 race
fiasco that resulted in Bobby Unser being penalized the next day, and the race
awarded to Mario Andretti. It was only because of the protest filed by
Andretti that ABC decided to focus on footage of Unser seemingly illegally
passing cars under the yellow flag and both Jim McKay and Jackie Stewart chose
to harp extensively about it......ONLY because in their artificial
after-the-fact call, they knew of the Andretti protest and thus chose to frame
their delayed broadcast around this budding controversy even though Unser was
insistent that he had properly blended in under the yellow according to the
rules agreed on before. But because ABC and Jackie Stewart were making such
a big deal focusing on "What is Bobby Unser doing????" public perception pegged
Unser as a cheater and thus made the initial decision to award the race to
Andretti seem like the "right" one.
>
> Ultimately, Unser appealed the ruling and was reinstated as race winner five
months later. But even though he went on to work for ABC years later and did
the 500 broadcast for many years, he was always vehement about how the network
had treated him that day. ABC apparently was so determined to manufacture a
storyline of Unser as cheater with something to hide that on the live part of
the broadcast at 11 PM as they were going to sign off they did *not* have a live
interview with Unser as race winner, as was the custom in the past, but instead
interviewed Andretti over the protest and then said that they couldn't get in
touch with Unser as if he was trying to duck them. Years later on an ESPN
Classic "Big Ticket" replay of the race, Unser flat-out called Jim McKay a liar,
saying he was in the Speedway Hojo's that night and that they knew where to
reach him.
>
> It was probably no coincidence that because of his role in inflating the
controversy in the broadcast, ABC demoted Jackie Stewart in 1982 and elevated
Sam Posey to the position of main race analyst.
>
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1242143625/25#25
Quote from epaddon on 12/01/09 at 23:53:58:
In '87, Al Trautwig was demoted from pit reporter to doing those kinds of fluffy
features. At one point they showed him peering in on a couple of the foreign
broadcast trucks, but for the most part had him following the storyline of
slowest qualifier Steve Chassey. Then after '87, I think ABC recognized that
they were doing just fine without that kind of filler feature material and just
confined their broadcast crew to the serious nuts and bolts of the race action.
That whole reasoning was strange because CBS had been doing the flag-to-flag
Daytona 500 since 1979, and the Michigan 500 was shown live, and they had no
problem keeping the audience's attention.
However, the change probably had more to do with the changes at the netowrk in
1988. The live broadcasts in 1986-1987 were under Roone Arledge, directed by
Larry Kamm's team. And ABC treated the broadcasts in the Jim McKay-esque "event
telecast" fashion. For 1988, Don Ohlmyer was brought in, and the broadcasts
changed dramatically. They became "race broadcasts" instead of "event"
broadcasts. Most of that fluff was eliminated entirely.
In 1988, strangely, they only had 2 pit reporters. I can't figure out if they
planned it that way, or had a last-minute change of plans. As we all know, the
pit lane at Indy is LONG (almost a half mile) and the '88 race had very hot
weather. Jack Arute and Brian Hammons (now the Golf Channel guy) must have been
sweating, huffin' and puffin' running back and forth.
True, the production team did change for 88 with Ohlmeyer's arrival, though to
be technically true it would have been Arledge holdovers rather than Arledge
producing the race since his role with ABC Sports ended in early 86 (save for
the 88 Winter Olympics).
Brian Hammons was never that good and I was glad that come 1990, they got Gary
Gerrould, meaning ABC now had the best of NBC's mid-80s Indy race team
broadcasters (Page-Unser-Gerould).
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1242143625/25#25
Quote from ZenoZone on 10/23/09 at 12:47:10:
Another interesting tidbit from the 1971-1985 Indy 500 tape delayed
broadcasts...
The commentary was done live for the pre-race, the start, and about the first
5-10 laps. Then they'd cut to commercial. At that point, the broadcast was
recorded without commentary. Depending upon the competitiveness of the race, the
producers would put the commentators back in the booth for about the last 10
laps. That way the call of the finish would be "spontaneous."
The rest of the commentary was done after-the-fact in post-production. So in
essence, the commentators already knew who won when they were calling segments
of the race! The segments were edited and pieced together. Usually they'd skip
huge portions of the race and cut to pre-recorded "personal" segments. A race
which took 3.5 hours (not including pre and post race) was squeezed into a 2 or
3 hour time slot.
And there is a strong case to be made that this style of broadcasting in which
the commentary was all after-the-fact was the direct cause of the 1981 race
fiasco that resulted in Bobby Unser being penalized the next day, and the race
awarded to Mario Andretti. It was only because of the protest filed by
Andretti that ABC decided to focus on footage of Unser seemingly illegally
passing cars under the yellow flag and both Jim McKay and Jackie Stewart chose
to harp extensively about it......ONLY because in their artificial
after-the-fact call, they knew of the Andretti protest and thus chose to frame
their delayed broadcast around this budding controversy even though Unser was
insistent that he had properly blended in under the yellow according to the
rules agreed on before. But because ABC and Jackie Stewart were making such
a big deal focusing on "What is Bobby Unser doing????" public perception pegged
Unser as a cheater and thus made the initial decision to award the race to
Andretti seem like the "right" one.
Ultimately, Unser appealed the ruling and was reinstated as race winner five
months later. But even though he went on to work for ABC years later and did
the 500 broadcast for many years, he was always vehement about how the network
had treated him that day. ABC apparently was so determined to manufacture a
storyline of Unser as cheater with something to hide that on the live part of
the broadcast at 11 PM as they were going to sign off they did *not* have a live
interview with Unser as race winner, as was the custom in the past, but instead
interviewed Andretti over the protest and then said that they couldn't get in
touch with Unser as if he was trying to duck them. Years later on an ESPN
Classic "Big Ticket" replay of the race, Unser flat-out called Jim McKay a liar,
saying he was in the Speedway Hojo's that night and that they knew where to
reach him.
It was probably no coincidence that because of his role in inflating the
controversy in the broadcast, ABC demoted Jackie Stewart in 1982 and elevated
Sam Posey to the position of main race analyst.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1120908/index.htm
Before anybody turns up his turbocharger and gives a boost to ABC-TV for its
smooth coverage of the Indianapolis 500 on Sunday, two points should be made.
First, a good 85% of the network's announcing, heard via tape more than five
hours after the race had finished, was pure theater. Get this: Race caller Jim
McKay and analyst Sam Posey knew almost the whole time that Tom Sneva would win.
They were acting. Their voices were laid over the tape after the fact. Second,
radio, not television, afforded the only timely comprehensive coverage of the
race. Paul Page, the voice of the Indy 500, created word pictures that were
vivid and authentic.
ABC has become so adept at faking in Indianapolis—this was the network's 13th
straight 500—that the phoniness probably slips by most viewers. Only the first
five laps and last five are covered "live," meaning that the voices of McKay and
Posey are recorded at the moment those laps are run. The rest of the broadcast
is ersatz. McKay and Posey camp themselves in a recording truck with cue sheets
in hand. As the taped segments come up, and at the very moment they are aired to
an estimated 40 million viewers, the announcers start talking. Lights, camera,
voice-over!
The illusion can make for high drama. McKay to Posey, hours after a crash in
which Mario Andretti wasn't injured: "Mario appears to be unconscious. His head
is not moving. Let's hope his legs aren't pinned." Sometimes the announcers
telegraph the outcome. Before Danny Ongais' crumpled body was extracted from the
wreckage of his car after a gruesome accident in 1981, not a few witnesses
thought he was dead. In his voice-over, Jackie Stewart, Posey's predecessor as
the analyst, said Ongais appeared to have a badly broken leg. Hospital bulletin
that evening: badly broken leg. And there was the 1981 furor when winner Bobby
Unser illegally passed cars during a caution lap. With the benefit of hindsight,
McKay and Stewart noticed it right off.
All the networks fake their coverage of things like cliff diving from Acapulco
or mixed-pairs bodybuilding from Passaic. Further, ABC doesn't air a canned 500
by choice. For years it has badgered the Indianapolis Motor Speedway to allow a
live broadcast, but the track is fearful of jeopardizing its massive live gate.
And the race is going to remain on tape for at least a while, which raises the
question of what to do about Suspense Theater.
Chuck Howard, ABC Sports' vice-president for program production, defends the
theatrics on unusual grounds—journalism. Here's his brief: Because ABC carries
the race for only three hours and because the network has to make time for
commercials and special interviews, only about 40% of the action ever sees the
light of day. Say laps 65 through 92 are among those that wind up on the
cutting-room floor. If McKay had been announcing live, important observations
might have been lost. With the voice-over he can weave all the story lines into
a nice, understandable tapestry.
The feeling here is that theater in the guise of journalism still amounts to
theater. One alternative is for ABC to televise the 500 tape in its entirety,
with the commentators working straight. Another is to fess up and superimpose
something like "Simulated Live Announcing" on the picture every so often. ABC
says that the former might bore some viewers and that the latter might embarrass
the network. So?
On the surface, you wouldn't have bet on the radio guys to win the checkered
flag. Last year ABC got four Emmys for its Indy coverage. As far as is known.
Page didn't even get a free meal at St. Elmo's Steakhouse in downtown
Indianapolis. The I.M.S. Radio Network can only guess how many people its 700
affiliates reach. Suffice it to say that the network, now 32 years old, reaches
the likes of Chicago, Lewistown, Mont. and 10,000 service-station lube bays
coast to coast.
For all of ABC's artistry—Posey has become a superb analyst, and director Larry
Kamm's cameras caught all of the action—Page and his 13 cohorts stationed around
the track accomplished what their TV rivals didn't. The radio voices were
genuine, not staged. There's no substitute for authenticity. As they relayed the
call around the track among themselves, a listener could see in his mind's eye
the sun glinting off Al Unser's brilliant yellow No. 7 and hear the engines 20
yards away. It was vintage live radio. As Page said before the race, "If you
want to feel the emotion of the event, then you come live it with us."
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1259294102
I recently downloaded a copy of the 1969 NBA all star game from an original
broadcast, and noticed something quite interesting. Early in the game, it was
said they were gonna go away till the 2nd half for coverage of the State of the
Union by President Eisenhower (faux pas?). When the time came for them to cut
away, the game continued and was able to be seen still, just without announcers.
I am assuming this particular copy of the game came direct from ABC's own
archives or something, since the entire game was able to be seen on the copy,
with nothing cut from it pretty much.
This brought to mind a question, in the 1973 all star game, ABC cut away with
about 2 minutes left in the 2nd quarter, to cover a speech from then President
Nixon. In the copy of that game that I have, the speech is included, with the
action left in the 1st half going unseen. I am just curious, if a copy of the
1969 game in full exists, is there a similar copy out there for the 1973 game?
Quote from BWBarefoot on Yesterday at 06:07:07:
Wow. That's interesting.
This raises the question as to why the NBA didn't schedule the games so that
they would not interfere with the speeches. The State of the Union is scheduled
well in advance, so the league couldn't use that as an excuse.
Just for the record the 1973 game wasn't interrupted by a state of the union, it
was a speech Nixon gave from the White House with regards to the war in Vietnam.
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/10/sports/tv-sports-quiet-talks-for-baseball.html\
?scp=1&sq=Major+League+Baseball+on+ABC&st=nyt
By Michael Goodwin
Published: Tuesday, February 10, 1987
Sign In to E-Mail
Reprints
Share
Close
LinkedinDiggFacebookMixxMySpaceYahoo! BuzzPermalinkIn terms of dollars, the
largest television sports contracts being negotiated are those involving the
National Football League and the three major networks.
But in terms of importance to the beleaguered TV sports industry, the football
discussions may be in second place. The top spot could go to the quiet talks ABC
and NBC are having with major league baseball.
That's because the baseball talks could achieve something dear to the hearts of
TV executives -renegotiation of a losing deal. ABC and NBC are halfway through
the six-year contracts totaling $1.1 billion they have with baseball, and
neither is happy, especially ABC.
''It's ugly,'' Dennis Swanson, the president of ABC Sports, said of the millions
his company is losing. There are reports that things were so grim that ABC was
willing to pay a hefty penalty to get out of the contract.
The networks have been losing money on many deals recently, largely because of a
sluggish advertising market and rising costs. Baseball has been a particular
concern both because of the large dollars involved - ABC and NBC will pay about
$200 million this year - and because the contracts have three more years to run.
While an agreement by baseball to renegotiate would not be unique in the
industry, it would be important because of the size and because the major sports
leagues traditionally have opposed renegotiation. The N.F.L., for example,
declined to change the terms of its most recent TV contracts despite heavy
losses by the networks. Football is talking now because its contracts have
expired.
Will baseball owners, who balk at renegotiating with players, oblige the
networks?
''I don't know,'' said Peter Ueberroth, the commissioner. ''We have a
partnership with the networks. Of course, you want to be healthy, but you want
your partner healthy, too.''
Ueberroth, in a recent telephone interview, was vague about how far baseball
would go, but he left the impression that renegotiation was possible.
''I honestly believe,'' he said, ''the networks are not making money on
baseball.'' He quickly added that he also believed it was not in baseball's
interest to have the networks seeking revenge at the next round of scheduled
talks.
Thus, the current, unscheduled ones, which the commissioner called ''always
ongoing.'' Once again he sought to demonstrate his seriousness by saying that
while such discussions run hot and cold, ''this is not a particularly cooled
down time.'' O.K., how serious is this? ''No comment,'' said one usually
gregarious TV executive. All the smoke does not mean the old contracts soon will
be scrapped, according to several participants, who said, along with Ueberroth,
that nothing would probably happen this season. Still, there was widespread
agreement that changes could come before the scheduled expiration of the
contracts, which is after the 1989 season.
Several of those involved said one option was adding several years to the
current contracts, with baseball giving the networks reduced rates for the added
years and agreeing to spread out the remaining payments. That way, the networks
would still pay the $625 million they owe, and then some, but over a longer
period of time.
There are two reasons why baseball would consider such a move: It would lock the
networks into a longer deal, and it would prevent a sudden drop in TV revenues
after 1989. Even Ueberroth concedes that the money troubles at the networks mean
the next baseball contracts are likely to be smaller, with the teams, which
share equally in network payments, making less from the networks in 1990 than in
1987. And Ueberroth, who has made ''fiscal sanity'' something of an owner
mantra, is not anxious to see any teams going broke because of TV.
The prime mover behind the talks is ABC, which, according to some estimate,
could lose $200 million over the six years. The contracts, which call for ABC to
pay more than half of the $1.1 billion, give NBC exclusive rights to Saturday
afternoon games and ABC exclusive rights to Monday nights. The networks
alternate the World Series and league championships. Part of ABC's problem is
that it uses only eight of the 20 Monday games it bought each year.
That it bought 20 games, then decided to show other programs on 12 Mondays, is
one reason why rival executives refer to the ABC baseball deal as the worst ever
negotiated. Another reason is a belief that ABC paid too much, regardless of how
many games it shows.
''Three years ago, we believed ABC's package was overpriced by $175 million,''
said Neil Pilson, the president of CBS Sports. ''We still believe it's
overpriced by $175 million.''
But did ABC become so desperate that it offered to pay baseball as much as $50
million to void the contract?
Pilson says so, adding that CBS was recently offered ABC's package, minus a
penalty fee, but declined.
Swanson paused when asked whether ABC had tried to get out of the deal. ''No,
not really,'' he said. ''Not with any specifics.'' Said Ueberroth: ''It could
have happened a long time ago. I'm not saying it did or didn't.'' Later, he
added: ''There's always hallway talk. But I don't think anything formal
happened. Not in any real sense.''
http://www.abcsportsalumni.tv/wordpress/
We've launched a NEW ABC Sports Alumni website!
ThIS Yahoo site is just too clunky, and un-user-friendly.
So . . .
Hope you'll find the new site easier to use - and more inviting.
We made it very simple. Down the road, as we get more users, we'll add
more/better features. In the meantime, please feel free to offer suggestions.
Follow the directions below (you might consider printing this email,) register,
and OFF WE GO!
Enjoy.
gsm
gsmason40@...
_______________________________
HOME PAGE (PUBLIC)
- Click on: http://www.abcsportsalumni.tv
- The slideshow has over 350 photos - from the old days - randomly selected to
give a good cross-section (see more later in the PHOTOS section.)
- If you see a photo you'd like to "linger" on, just click the photo once, and
it will freeze the slideshow. Click again to release.
- Below the slideshow, click the arrow button to PLAY the Medley. PAUSE button
will stop the music. SPEAKER button manages the volume.
now . . .
YOU MUST REGISTER! (This is a one-time only process.)
Click on: http://www.abcsportsalumni.tv/wordpress/wp-login.php?action=register
Fill in the information. YOU WILL BE ASKED TO ENTER AN INVITATION CODE . . . IT
IS: 458976
You will immediately receive an email to validate your registration.
Once you validate as per the instructions in this email, YOU'RE IN!!
(If you do not receive this email, suggest you check your SPAM mailbox.)
HOME PAGE (MEMBERS ONLY)
- You will see six tabs at the top . . .
MEMBERS LIST TAB
- This list will be populated as members register (during your initial LOG IN
process,) and will be largely self-explanatory. One new feature: clicking on a
member's email address will enable you to send that member a PM (Private
Message.)
MESSAGE BOARD TAB
- Click on this tab to see a list of messages which have been posted by members
(only!) - as well as the number of comments (if any) on that particular TOPIC.
- Once you click on the message, you will be able to read ALL comments made in
response to that Topic.
- Click the COMPOSE button to post your own message.
- The MY INBOX button takes you to private messages which have been sent to you.
- Later on - down the road - we'll add Facebook/Twitter/etc interface . . . once
we get everyone migrated over from the Yahoo site.
PHOTOS TAB
(Many of which have been kindly supplied by our friends in the ABC Photo Dept.)
- I have (arbitrarily) arranged this section into six albums - just to get us
started. This is NOT to suggest that we want to limit the albums that you'd
like to browse - and even post yourself. But for the time being . . . if there
are photos you'd like to share with us all, just email them to me, and I'll post
them asap. At some point soon, we'll have it programmed so that you can save me
the time and trouble.
- The POTPOURRI album drives the slideshow on the HOME PAGE.
- Click on "View with PicLens" to view each photo individually.
- The five other albums are self-explanatory.
- Just click/drag (to your desktop) on a photo to save it for yourself.
IN MEMORIAM TAB
- Will be updated as necessary.
LOGOUT TAB
- To go elsewhere!
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/64174
ohn Skipper,
ESPN executive vice president of content
Skipper calls the September 2006 re-opening of the Superdome in New Orleans the
best moment he's personally experienced with "Monday Night Football." It
happened within the first month of ESPN televising the games.
"When the Saints blocked that punt and scored, I have never heard it louder on
`Monday Night Football.' It just felt really important. It felt like it was
almost some sort of mystical power working in there."
The finality of MNF on ABC
affected more than NFL fans.
Fred Gaudelli,
NBC producer of "Sunday Night Football"
(MNF producer from 2001-05)
One of the franchise's starkest memories for Gaudelli came in December 2005,
when ABC ended its 36-year run broadcasting "Monday Night Football" with a
Patriots win over the Jets. "We had a few wonderful elements in the show, but as
we played the close in the final production meeting — Hank Williams singing
"turn out the lights" set to highlights of 36 years — I looked around the room
and saw tears just about in everyone's eyes, including Al's, John's and our
special guest Frank Gifford. It struck me then, we were saying goodbye to a very
special era, one that would never be the same again."
Jay Rothman,
ESPN's MNF producer
U2 and Green Day perform during re-opening
of Superdome
Rothman says he will never forget the September 2006 re-opening of the
Superdome. "I didn't realize how big that game was until the day afterwards. I
knew the responsibility we had that night and I thought we did a really good job
executing, but I still didn't understand the impact we had. The next day I was
bombarded with e-mails, including one from someone who worked for many years on
ABC's `Monday Night Football.' He said that in all the games, he's never been
more proud of a `Monday Night Football' telecast, and that meant a lot to me."
Frank Gifford,
former MNF analyst
When asked at an industry function to pick a memorable moment from his time on
the show, Gifford brought up the night John Lennon was assassinated. "I remember
refusing to let Howard [Cosell] make that announcement on the air until we knew
for certain that it had indeed happened," Gifford said on a conference call
earlier this fall. "It had been just two to three years before that I had
invited John Lennon to be in our booth in Los Angeles. … It was an interesting
night because we also had Ronald Reagan. … Howard was scheduled to interview
[former California] Gov. Reagan at halftime and he turned around and immediately
saw that John Lennon was also there. He said, `Gifford, you take the governor
and I'll take the Beatle.'"
Howard Katz,
NFL senior vice president of broadcasting and media operations
Katz was a production assistant for MNF in 1972 and 1973. "It was a wild ride
back in those days. We called it the `Brother Love Traveling Salvation Show.'"
What are his most significant moments from then? "Nothing I would want to
print."
Chip Dean,
ESPN's MNF director
"Before our first `Monday Night Football' game in 2006, I got an e-mail from a
fellow ESPN employee who worked with me on the original overnight `SportsCenter'
between 1980 to '83. He told me, `The shareholders and all of our 401Ks are
counting on you.' Before the game on the field an executive turned to me and
said, `The weight of the network is on your shoulders.' I never get nervous
before a game, but that's the first time I felt the butterflies and realized how
big this was for us."
Mike Tirico,
ESPN's MNF play-by-play commentator
Grieving Favre's special night in 2003
stands out for Esocoff.
"Throughout my career, there have been a litany of explanations my wife and I
have used to describe my job — works at ESPN, NBA, college football, golf, ESPN
Radio host, etc. Once you get this job, people know what `Monday Night Football'
is. That's all you have to say, so it's made the explanation a lot simpler. When
I'm traveling and in an airport, or in other public places, I'm now `Monday
Night Football guy' instead of, `Aren't you the guy on ESPN?'"
Drew Esocoff,
NBC director of "Sunday Night Football"
(MNF director from 2000-05)
Esocoff best remembers the December 2003 game when the Packers beat the Raiders
41-7, one night after Brett Favre's father died. Favre passed for 399 yards and
four touchdowns. "It just seemed like every teammate made every play like it was
only for Brett."
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/64132
By JOHN OURAND
Staff writer
Published November 23, 2009 : Page 01
ESPN cameras were focused on Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes as the couple stood on
the FedEx Field turf just before ESPN's first regular-season "Monday Night
Football" game in September 2006.
Cruise and Holmes were guests of Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder, but
for ESPN executives, they provided the perfect imagery as the network took
control of the high-profile NFL series. The presence of the Hollywood stars
recalled the early days of "Monday Night Football," when celebrities like John
Lennon and John Wayne would drop by the booth and banter with the announcers,
creating watercooler talk for the next day.
For more than three decades, "Monday Night Football" was the NFL's biggest
weekly event, and ESPN executives were eager to put their own stamp on it — so
much so that ESPN's John Skipper advocated dumping Hank Williams Jr.'s "Are You
Ready for Some Football?" intro before ESPN's Norby Williamson talked him into
keeping it.
The Disney-owned network followed the historical playbook. It hired Tony
Kornheiser to fill the Howard Cosell role, and it planned a steady stream of
celebrity interviews and cultural touch points that only tangentially dealt with
football.
It would be the perfect mix of ESPN's hip and brash style with the pop-culture
traditions of "Monday Night Football." The series had just ended a 36-year run
on ABC but had floundered at the end of it. Its final year on ABC, in 2005, saw
the series' lowest rating, a 10.8 average. More importantly, the franchise
produced far less buzz. ESPN was set to change that, and the opening night just
outside of Washington, D.C., was going to be the start of that new era.
On the surface, the move was smooth. Ad sales were robust, and ESPN's ratings,
while lower than ABC's, still dwarfed everything else on cable.
But cracks showed immediately. Kornheiser did not mesh with fellow analyst Joe
Theismann, and ESPN's slate of games was much less compelling than NBC's new
Sunday night prime-time schedule.
Viewers and critics panned the forced celebrity interviews. In its first year,
following a bizarre booth appearance by actor Christian Slater, CNN.com posted a
column titled "Why I hate `Monday Night Football,'" which cited "over-the-top
plugs for ABC and annoying celebrity interviews."
ESPN wasn't deterred and kept interviewing celebrities into its second season,
culminating in a ribald October 2007 appearance by comedian Jimmy Kimmel that
was bashed by critics and ESPN executives after he took cheap shots at
Kornheiser and his then-former colleague Theismann. Ron Jaworski had replaced
Theismann after the 2006 season.
"We got ourselves excited that we had to recapture the glory of `Monday Night
Football' and bring guests to the booth and do all this
bigger-than-just-football stuff," said Skipper, ESPN's executive vice president
of content. "I recently have come to believe that when `Monday Night Football'
did all that stuff, it was a different world. There were only three channels,
and you were fighting for a big piece of a pie. Most of the people that come now
are football fans."
And all of the people in the booth now are football experts. This past
offseason, ESPN chose former coach Jon Gruden to replace humor/sportswriter
Kornheiser, further emphasizing its move toward all things football. Last week,
Gruden agreed to a multiyear extension to stay at ESPN.
"If you have Gruden in the booth with Jaworski, it's common sense that you're
going to dive into the execution and the strategy of the game in front of you,"
said Williamson, ESPN's executive vice president of production.
ESPN also decided to can in-the-booth interviews; curtailed talk of cultural
trends during the game; and brought less talent and production to each game,
giving the telecasts less of a circus-like atmosphere and allowing the network
to focus on the game at hand.
"We have less studio shows at the event," Skipper said. "We have less guests in
the booth. If you went back to look at the games, you'd see these packages where
we were trying to reflect cultural things. We've got less of those. Now, we just
let the guys do the game. I think people are responding to that."
ESPN also worked closely with the NFL on creating a schedule that, while not
getting the best games, will feature compelling matchups.
Coincidence or not, the TV numbers for "Monday Night Football" in its 40th
season have skyrocketed.
Through the first 10 games of the season, the venerable series pulled its
highest ratings since it moved to ESPN, and nine of the 10 games posted a
viewership increase from last year.
So far this season, "Monday Night Football" has averaged 14.573 million viewers,
topping the previous high (12.955 million in 2006) by more than 12 percent. The
cable number does still fall below 2005's 15.9 million viewers, which was an
all-time low in 36 years on ABC, as well as the mark for NBC's prime-time
package, which was averaging 19.452 million viewers through its first 10 games
this year. Still, it's the gains that are notable.
"ESPN stopped treating it as a marketing stunt and has focused on the product
and on football," said Mark Lazarus, the former Turner Sports head who is now
president of media and marketing for Career Sports & Entertainment. "And that
has been to their benefit."
Advertisers are responding, as well. The strong ratings are helping ESPN's ad
sales efforts this season, especially since the network held inventory back for
the scatter market.
"`Monday Night Football' is benefiting from higher ratings so that we are able
to put inventory that we set aside for make-goods back into sale," said Ed
Erhardt, ESPN's president of customer marketing and sales. "You can sell the
scatter in a strong market; you can sell the unit because you have the ratings
points."
But this year's renaissance of "Monday Night Football" is more than just ratings
and ad sales. Sports industry executives notice a bigger feel to the games, with
more big games peppering ESPN's schedule.
"I don't care if it's on ABC or ESPN," Lazarus said. "The league created and
intended for `Monday Night Football' to be a happening. And it is."
One of ESPN's games this year, Brett Favre's first game against the Packers in
Week 4, drew a cable-record audience of 21.839 million viewers. Its opening
telecast of the season documented Patriots quarterback Tom Brady's first game
back from knee surgery and logged an average of 14.001 million viewers.
This season, ESPN's "Monday Night Football" games account for cable's 10 biggest
audiences in 2009.
Howard Katz, the NFL's senior vice president of broadcasting and media
operations, is the executive tasked with creating the broadcasters' schedules.
He said the best "Monday Night Football" games on ESPN are the ones that allow
the network to advance story lines across its TV, broadband and mobile
platforms. ESPN executives have long said that they view "Monday Night Football"
as much more than a three-hour window, and it's clear that the NFL agrees.
"We look for opportunities for ESPN to tell stories," Katz said. "They do that
so well and can support `Monday Night Football' with other programming."
The difference this year is that ESPN has been telling those stories during its
90-minute pregame show and its shoulder programming on Monday afternoons rather
than during the telecast. As an example, Williamson pointed to the Oct. 26
Eagles-Redskins game, which occurred just days after the Redskins stripped coach
Jim Zorn of his play-calling duties. The team had Sherman Lewis call the
offensive plays even though weeks before he had been calling bingo games while
in quasi-retirement.
One of ESPN's features involved interviews with people who played bingo with
Lewis. The network decided to run it during its pregame show.
"Sometimes in the past, maybe we felt compelled to force that into the game. I
think you learn from that over time," Williamson said.
All of ESPN's executives emphasized that they're proud of the first three years
they produced "Monday Night Football" games, saying that the franchise will
constantly be tweaked as it moves forward, but it's likely to retain a football
focus for the foreseeable future.
"It's very easy to take chances with things that are under the radar,"
Williamson said. "We take educated risks. We tweak things as we get feedback
from fans. We're not going to back off of that."
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1221169782/50#50
I'll post the whole article here (got this from Newsbank):
COSELL IS BACK MONDAY NIGHT BASEBALL REACQUAINTS VIEWERS
Boston Globe - Friday, June 21, 1985
Author: Jack Craig, Globe Staff
Howard Cosell has left the impression for quite a while of being a fellow who
has lost his way on team sports broadcasts, and his performance on ABC's Monday
Night Baseball Mets-Cubs broadcast (Channel 5) strengthened that suspicion.
It was Cosell's first such broadcast since last fall's American League playoffs,
when he jousted so often with Al Michaels on play-by-play that what began as a
curiosity ended as a distraction.
Cosell and Michaels were reunited Monday at Shea Stadium, with Jim Palmer also
working, and this time the exchanges often were lively but not excessive.
However, Cosell got into trouble, as usually happens to him on baseball when he
tries to deliver a lecture on the obvious or travel down memory lane.
It's as if Cosell doesn't realize that millions of others also can call up vivid
images of a generation of players past.
As usual, Cosell occasionally interrupted Michaels and Palmer. He has done just
that for so long that his colleagues merely shrug.
"All things considered, it was a good broadcast," Michaels said of Monday
night's telecast with Cosell, a safe, yet vague summary of the long evening.
Michaels has worked with Cosell frequently enough not to be surprised by
anything that is said in the broadcast booth.
No matter how often the tape is rerun of Chris Chambliss' home run that enabled
the Yankees to steal the 1976 pennant from the Royals, it is still astounding
that Cosell yanked the microphone from Keith Jackson and held onto it with a
pitched voice as Chambliss rounded first base.
An ABC director once explained these impolite interruptions as Cosell's honest
belief that he is the major announcer in the booth on any sports event and that
he is expected to take command when a dramatic moment arrives.
How then would a pop psychologist explain Cosell's name-dropping, which reached
its nadir Monday night, even by his standards. It was set up when Michaels noted
that ABC's "Nightline" later that evening would focus on the hijacking drama and
host Ted Koppel's guest would be Henry Kissinger.
Cosell responded that he had seen Kissinger at lunch that very afternoon and the
latter had not mentioned he would be on the program. The Kissinger connection
wasn't the only Cosell name-drop on the broadcast. While recently visiting the
wailing wall at Jerusalem, Cosell said, he met Don Shula.
None of this was even remotely linked to the game in progress, which is the way
Cosell has been operating these days, as he wanders off the diamond to talk
about himself.
It is not so surprising that after three decades in sports broadcasting, a man
with an ego so large he makes his peers, many of whom have large egos
themselves, seem humble, would finally and almost irrevocably be turned off.
The reaction at ABC this week to Monday night's braodcast was to pronounce
Cosell a success. "He was a positive force. He made the game more interesting
with his byplay," said Jim Spence, ABC Sports vice president. He said Cosell
will participate in the five remaining Monday night telecasts this season, in
any Sunday afternoon games carried in September, and in the World Series that
ABC will cover if a player strike does not take place.
For a salary exceeding $1 million a year, that is the least Cosell should do
after walking away from boxing two years ago and from Monday night football last
fall, declaring the former morally corrupt and the latter irrelevent.
He did participate this spring in the network's coverage of the Kentucky Derby
and Preakness, a tennis tournament and amateur boxing. Cosell also was the
principal boxing announcer for ABC's 1984 Summer Olympics, where his description
of some bouts left a doubt - no fooling - about his eyesight.
His main event on ABC now is SportsBeat, a half-hour weekly program, the only
network sports news program and the least-watched sports series ever. It would
have expired by now except for the prominence of the host, but even Cosell may
not be able to salvage it after this year.
Cosell is also a unique personality, unlikely to be duplicated. His notoriety
carried such impact when he came upon the scene in the '60s that, on balance, he
was deemed a positive force.
Anyone else who received such a rude reception as Cosell did on Monday night
from the Shea crowd when his presence was announced on the scoreboard would be
in deep trouble. Instead, it probably was interpreted by his bosses as proof
that he still draws a response.
http://sportsmediawatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/patscolts-classic-boosts-nbc.html
Patriots/Colts was just the latest big draw for NBC Sunday Night Football, which
is averaging the most viewers for an NFL primetime package in over a decade.
Sunday's Patriots/Colts game drew a 13.7/21 final rating and 22.4 million
viewers on NBC, up 25% and 27%, respectively, from last year's comparable
Giants/Eagles game (11.0/18, 17.6 mil). The game was the second most-viewed NFL
telecast of Week 10, behind only the national window on FOX (15.9/29, 26.7 mil).
Patriots/Colts ranks as the second-highest rated, second-most viewed Sunday
Night Football game of the season, behind only Giants/Cowboys in Week 2 (15.1,
24.8 mil), and ahead of the previous #2 game -- last week's Cowboys/Eagles
matchup (13.1, 21.9 mil).
Additionally, the game stands as the fourth-most viewed regular season NFL
telecast on NBC since the network resumed airing games in '06. Overall, 5 of the
10 most-viewed regular season games on NBC since '06 have taken place this
season.
Through Week 10, NBC is averaging a 12.0/19 rating and 19.8 million viewers for
Sunday Night Football, up 20% and 22%, respectively, from a 10.0 and 16.2
million through Week 10 last season.
The 19.8 million viewers is the most for an NFL primetime package through this
point in the season since '97, when Monday Night Football on ABC averaged 20.6
million.This marks the first time in the decade that an NFL primetime package
has averaged at least 19 million viewers through Week 10 of the season.
Since the start of the NFL season, Sunday Night Football ranks as the highest
rated, most-viewed program on television. Additionally, SNF is the top program
among adults 18-49 (7.8), 18-34 (6.9) and 25-54 (8.4), as well as all key male
demos.
Viewership for NFL primetime broadcast package since '97
* Sunday Night Football from '06-'09; Monday Night Football from '97-'05
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2745/4115014649_907c3e5c33.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pASnLE46i4&feature=related
Part 1 of 3
1988 Michigan Wolverines Starting Lineups...
OFFENSE:
Split End - Greg McMurtry
Split End - Chris Calloway
Split End - Derrick Walker
Left Tackle - Tom Dohring
Left Tackle - Mike Husar
Left Guard - Mike Husar
Left Guard - Dave Chester
Center - John Vitale
Right Guard - Dean Dingman
Right Tackle - Greg Skrepenak
Tight End - Jeffrey Brown
Tight End - Derrick Walker
Flanker - John Kolesar
Flanker - Chris Calloway
Quarterback - Michael Taylor
Quarterback - Demetrius Brown
Tailback - Tony Boles
Tailback - Leroy Hoard
Tailback - Tracy Williams
Fullback - Leroy Hoard
Fullback - Jarrod Bunch
Fullback - Chris Horn
DEFENSE:
Defensive Tackle - Brent White
Defensive Tackle - John Herrman
Defensive Tackle - Mike Evans
Middle Guard - T.J. Osman
Defensive Tackle - Mark Messner
Outside Linebacker - Bobby Abrams
Outside Linebacker - Alex Marshall
Outside Linebacker - Tim Williams
Outside Linebacker - Anthony Mitchell
Inside Linebacker - J.J. Grant
Inside Linebacker - Marc Spencer
Inside Linebacker - John Milligan
Inisde Linebacker - Erick Anderson
Cornerback - David Key
Cornerback - David Arnold
Cornerback - Todd Plate
Strong Safety - Tripp Welborne
Free Safety - Vada Murray
http://sportsmediawatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/abc-to-be-shut-out-of-nba-conferenc\
e.html
The 2010 NBA Conference Finals could be a cable exclusive affair.
Sports Business Journal reports that ESPN is slated to air the entire 2010
Eastern Conference Finals. In previous years, ESPN sister network ABC has aired
at least one game of the Conference Finals.
This would be the first time since 2004 that not a single game of the NBA
Conference Finals has aired on broadcast television.
If none of the NBA's second round series goes to a 7th game, ABC could still
conceivably air Game 1 of the Conference Finals on a Sunday afternoon -- as was
done in '07 (Jazz/Spurs Game 1), '05 (Spurs/Suns Game 1) and '03 (Nets/Pistons
Game 1).
The move comes months after the NBA's three television partners drew superb
ratings during the Conference Finals. The Lakers/Nuggets and Magic/Cavaliers
series averaged 8.6 million viewers, and included the 4 most-viewed NBA games
ever on cable. Overall, ratings for the Conference Finals were the highest since
'02, when NBC carried the bulk of the games.
The strong numbers came despite only one of the games airing on ABC -- and that
game was only the 7th-most viewed of the round.
The ratings success, achieved largely without the aid of a broadcast television
showcase, has evidently emboldened ESPN.
ESPN EVP of content John Skipper told Sports Business Journal that the
"continuity" of having all the games on one network is "more important than the
[household] differential" between ESPN (99 million homes) and ABC (114 million).
Skipper: "We are going to clearly position that for sports, there is no
significant differentiation between broadcast and cable."
The numbers appear to back him up. Excluding the NBA Finals, ABC averaged 5.3
million viewers for the playoffs as a whole, not much higher than ESPN's 4.9
million and TNT's 4.7 million.
ABC's lead looks even less impressive when one considers that the network only
aired 10 playoff games prior to the Finals -- and those 10 games were generally
the highest-profile games of the day. Meanwhile, ESPN and TNT aired nearly all
of the other playoff games -- including series without much mainstream appeal
like Magic/76ers or Rockets/Blazers.
Overall, ABC appears to be less and less of a priority for ESPN. The entire Bowl
Championship Series will air on ESPN starting in 2011 -- including the Rose
Bowl, which had previously been an ABC staple. The signs were evident early in
the college football season as well, when ESPN saved one of the biggest Saturday
night games of the season for itself (USC/Ohio State) rather than air it on
ABC's Saturday Night Football.
And there's the fact that ABC will air only 15 regular season NBA games this
year, the bare minimum, and the fewest since 2002-03.
With this in mind, how long before the NBA Finals becomes a cable exclusive
affair as well?
Source: Sports Business Journal
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/64002
With margins shrinking, how can broadcasters remain in the game and keep buying
sports rights?
Print This Story By JOHN OURAND
Staff writer
Published November 09, 2009 : Page 01
Less than a day before Game 5 of the American League Championship Series in
Anaheim last month, a large number of Yankees fans in New York were in danger of
not being able to watch their beloved pinstripes on local TV.
News Corp. was minutes away from pulling its Fox channels, Fox 5 and WWOR-MYT,
from Cablevision's systems over a retransmission consent dispute, according to
several sources.
Fox was threatening to pull its channels at midnight on Oct. 22, about 20 hours
before the key Game 5 was slated to begin on the network.
If it had done so, Cablevision's 3 million subscribers in the greater New York
market would not have been able to watch the game, creating a situation that
would have enraged local Yankees fans and caused a major PR issue for the
network, the cable operator and even the team.
But the crisis was averted late that Wednesday night when the two signed a
one-year extension to keep the Fox networks on Cablevision's systems. Game 5 hit
the air and drew a whopping 20.8 rating in the New York market, underscoring the
power that televised sports play in these types of negotiations.
The dispute marks the underpinnings of one of the most important stories
developing in sports media, but one that isn't talked about or publicized like
so many others.
The debate over retransmission rights — where broadcasters want cable operators
to pay cash to carry their local stations — will be one of the most closely
watched issues over the next year, as the two sides try to determine how high
the monthly "retrans fee" should be.
Is competition for ESPN starting to emerge "around the fringes?"
Is more live game programming next stepfor league-owned networks?
It's not a stretch to suggest that the long-term future of broadcast networks as
pivotal players in televised sports is at stake. If broadcasters somehow don't
add dollars to their coffers, the likelihood of big payouts during the next
round of major sports TV negotiations from 2011 to 2013, which include the NFL,
MLB and NHL, seems remote.
Retransmission consent battles are not new. In 2000, Time Warner Cable famously
dropped ABC in New York City during the broadcast sweeps period because of a
retransmission consent dispute.
But as the economy has wreaked havoc on the TV advertising market, these
disputes have taken on a new urgency for broadcasters. They need new revenue
streams. It's pretty simple: Broadcasters don't have the dual revenue streams of
ESPN and rely mainly on advertising revenue, which is clearly not growing.
Fox and Cablevision came to terms just
in time for Game 5 of the ALCS.In the New York market alone, ad sales are down
35 percent year over year, and next year they are projected to be flat,
according to one veteran New York television executive.
To counter that decline, which is affecting stations all over the country, Fox
and CBS have said they plan to start charging cable operators to carry their
stations. Some reports have News Corp. charging cable operators 50 cents per
subscriber per month for its locally owned and operated Fox stations, and 25
cents for its MyNetworkTV affiliates, local broadcast stations that Fox also
owns.
For Cablevision, with its 3 million subscribers, that could result in a monthly
payout of $2.25 million for Fox. By comparison, Cablevision pays ESPN around $12
million per month for its flagship channel alone. That's what broadcasters are
up against, and why they feel the need to be paid cash for their stations.
"It's not rocket science," Chase Carey, News Corp.'s deputy chairman, said at an
industry conference last month. "It doesn't make sense that broadcast is only ad
supported. It competes against other channels that are dual revenue businesses,
while a network like Fox sits there with truly the best programming in sports
and entertainment."
Turnkey Sports Poll
The following are results of the Turnkey Sports Poll taken in October. The
survey covered more than 1,100 senior-level sports industry executives spanning
professional and college sports.
In the next five years of sports property television rights negotiations, which
channel/media company will be . . .
CBS ESPN/ABC Fox NBC
… the most aggressive at obtaining rights to additional sporting events? 1.42%
54.96% 8.51% 5.32%
… most likely to shed rights? 15.96% 3.90% 7.09% 25.89%
Turner (TBS/TNT) Versus Other No response/ Not sure
3.90% 15.25% 1.77% 8.87%
13.83% 9.57% 1.06% 22.70%
What will be the trend in sports television rights fees over the next five
years? (Results compared to April 2004 poll)
Oct. 2009 April 2004
Remain flat 40.64% 36.81%
Trend up 36.40% 31.29%
Trend down 20.49% 31.29%
No response/Not sure 2.47% 0.61%
Source: Turnkey Sports & Entertainment in conjunction with SportsBusiness
Journal. Turnkey Intelligence specializes in research, measurement and lead
generation for brands and properties. Visit www.turnkeyse.com.
The battles are only just beginning. While the Cablevision fight was averted,
another major dispute is brewing with New York's other main cable operator, Time
Warner Cable, whose contracts to carry all Fox channels — cable and broadcast —
expire at the end of the year.
In late December 2008, Time Warner Cable signed a one-year extension for several
of Fox's cable channels, including FX, and regional sports networks Prime
Ticket, Fox Sports West, Southwest, South and Florida (see SportsBusiness
Journal, Jan. 12). Those deals, along with all of Fox's other broadcast and
cable channels, expire at the end of next month.
Could these signals actually be pulled from Time Warner Cable, which is in more
than 13 million U.S. homes? Well, given the history of cable industry
negotiations, most of the cable executives contacted by SportsBusiness Journal
expect News Corp.'s Time Warner Cable negotiation to really heat up as the New
Year's Eve deadline approaches.
And those same executives expect News Corp. to base much of its leverage on
Fox's slate of NFL playoff games, not to mention Fox's highly rated "American
Idol" and "24" series, both of which return in January. Imagine the scene in
Gotham if, for example, Time Warner Cable isn't able to show a Giants playoff
game on Fox.
The need for broadcasters to push harder for a dual revenue stream was
highlighted last year when ESPN outbid Fox by $100 million for rights to the
Bowl Championship Series. Thanks to the amount of money cable and satellite
operators pay ESPN each month (more than $4 per subscriber), ESPN already has a
huge advantage over its rivals. Cable operators also pay ESPN additional license
fees for its other networks, ESPN2, ESPNews, ESPNU and even the broadband
channel ESPN360.
Broadcasters are seeking additional revenue to
help them better compete in the next big round
of major sports television negotiations from
2011 to 2013.Without retransmission consent revenue, broadcasters would not be
able to match ESPN's bids for most sports rights. This is especially relevant
over the next five years, as TV deals are expiring with the NHL (2011), NFL and
MLB (2013) and NASCAR and MLS (2014).
Broadcasters say they need retransmission dollars to stay competitive in the
sports rights marketplace. But they are quick to point out that even without the
extra cash flow, they have some inherent advantages over their cable
competitors.
The one most frequently mentioned is the breadth of their offerings, which reach
115 million homes, compared with ESPN's 99 million.
That gap has been narrowing over the past decade and is expected to continue
shrinking. But most leagues still place a high value on reaching those extra 16
million homes.
"I anticipate that in the next five years, the premier events that are currently
on network television will remain on network television," said Sean McManus,
president of CBS News and CBS Sports. "I think the leagues still understand the
value of having them on network television and how important it is to their
viewership and their fans."
Network sports DEALS
Property Length Estimated total value Final season contract
NFL 8 years $5.76 billion 2013
MLB 7 years $1.8 billion 2013
NASCAR 8 years $1.76 billion 2014
Bowl Championship Series* 4 years $330 million-$340 million 2010
NBA 6 years $4.6 billion** 2015-16
SEC (all sports) 15 years $2.25 billion 2023
NASCAR 8 years $2.16 billion 2014
Big Ten 10 years $900 million-$1.0 billion 2017
Bowl Championship Series*** 4 years $495 million 2014
Big 12 8 years $480 million 2014
Rose Bowl presented by Citi 8 years $300 million 2014
ACC football 7 years $258 million 2010
ACC basketball 10 years $300 million 2010-11
Pac-10 football 5 years $229 million 2011
Big East football 6 years $200 million 2012
MLS 8 years $64 million 2014
IndyCar 4 years $60 million-$65 million 2012
Belmont Stakes 5 years $20 million 2010
NCAA men's basketball tournament 11 years $6 billion 2012-13
NFL 8 years $4.96 billion 2013
PGA Tour 6 years $2.95 billion** 2012
SEC basketball and football 15 years $825 million 2023
Big Ten basketball 10 years $200 million 2015-16
USTA U.S. Open 4 years $145 million 2011
The Masters 1 year $3 million/year Year-to-year
NFL 8 years $4.82 billion 2013
Olympics Winter and Summer Games $4.3 billion 2012
PGA 6 years $2.95 billion** 2012
Wimbledon 4 years $52 million 2011
Notre Dame football 5 years $50 million 2015
NHL 2 years ^ 2010-11
Kentucky Derby and Belmont Stakes 5 years NA 2010
USGA U.S. Open 9 years NA 2014
U.S. Figure Skating 6 years NA 2014
Note: ABC contracts may share cable rights with ESPN channels, NBC with TBS/TNT
and CBS with USA Network.
* Excluding Rose Bowl presented by Citi. ESPN/ABC Sports assumes rights
following Jan. 2010 Championship Game
** Part of a shared deal with other networks.
*** Network assumes rights from Fox following January 2010 championship game
^ Deal is a revenue-sharing agreement and does not carry any rights fees.
Source: SportsBusiness Journal research
NBC executives echoed McManus' sentiment, saying that the bigger leagues make
sure that they maintain a broadcast presence so they can reach more people.
"Yes, I think there are places where a network can compete and, in many cases,
deliver significantly greater value than ESPN," said NBC Sports President Ken
Schanzer. "Leagues need broad exposure. They need exposure to the right
audiences to grow their fan base and they need exposure in the right time
periods."
Even ESPN executives acknowledge the power that broadcast television has on some
of its rights holders. John Skipper, ESPN executive vice president of content,
said the company would have had trouble signing deals with the NBA and World Cup
if it didn't have broadcast windows through ABC.
"We are not abandoning ABC," Skipper said. "We are, right now, not looking to
move other product off of ABC. We like having those windows."
It's not just the leagues that place a value on broadcasters' reach. McManus
predicted that regulators almost certainly would step in if some marquee
sporting events, like the Super Bowl, were to migrate to cable.
"It's a fine balance between taking advantage of the cable model, which has a
dual revenue stream, but also protecting the network model, which still has
great value for the biggest sporting events in America ."
But leagues need more than good will and immense reach. They want networks with
deep pockets — ones that can afford to pay the most for their games.
McManus believes the TV deal CBS signed with the Southeastern Conference last
summer provides a blueprint for how broadcasters can share TV packages with
cable networks.
CBS paid an average of $55 million annually for a 15-year deal that includes a
late Saturday afternoon window for a game of CBS's choice, one prime-time game
and two doubleheaders per year. ESPN paid $150 million per year for the rest of
the conference's rights.
"We found out in the SEC negotiation that there was room for ESPN and room for a
really good network package," McManus said. "There can be bigger and more
valuable cable portions of a lot of these deals, but the network component is
still a critical one for most leagues."
But the key for broadcasters remains getting retransmission consent payments for
their local stations. In fact, most cable operators say it's almost inevitable
that they will have to make these payments — they're just negotiating to keep
the fees as low as possible.
"Against today's model of an ad-supported-only broadcast network, sports rates
are a real challenge," Carey said at that New York conference last month.
"Sports are going to continue to be a critical part of our story. We're going to
create great content and create a business model that lets us continue to grow
and expand."
http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1257539729
He was considered uncritical to the point of failing to point out the obvious,
and sometimes thought dull. Schenkel, who rose to prominence in New York in the
1950s as the TV voice of the football Giants, was hired by ABC as its "big name"
sportscaster. (Jim McKay was considered not as well known, even though he hosted
Wide World of Sports.)
But Schenkel, when assigned to college football, which he considered purely
amateur, didn't want to criticize players. Former coach Bud Wilkinson was
similarly minded, so a quarterback who threw three interceptions wasn't pointed
out, even if it cost his team a game.
Additionally, Schenkel bend over backwards to make sponsors happy. Chevrolet was
(and is) a college football sponsor on ABC. One afternoon, Schenkel was calling
a Southern Medhodist game. He went out of his way to not use the SMU nickname,
Mustangs, lest someone think he was pushing a Ford product.
Still, as the announcer lists (you guys are amazing!) show, Schenkel and
Wilkinson remained ABC's No. 1 team through the early 1970s.
What really caused Schenkel's drop was the 1972 Munich Olympics. Schenkel, as he
had been at Grenoble and Mexico City in 1968, was ABC's prime-time host. Then
came the taking of Israeli hostages. Roone Arledge assigned McKay, who cut his
journalistic teeth at the Baltimore Sun, to anchor the live continuous coverage,
which ran all day in the U.S., and kept him in the lead chair when prime time
rolled around. Schenkel was on the set (along with Peter Jennings and Lou
Cioffi, ABC News' two Middle East correspondents, both of whom just happened to
be on vacation in Munich), but McKay led the way. Schenkel threw in a lame
comment every so often, but he just didn't fit.
After that, Keith Jackson, whom Arledge had screwed over after the 1970 NFL
season, failing to tell him in person that Frank Gifford was replacing him,
began to get better college football assignments. Schenkel was relegated to the
No. 2 game, then left college football entirely to concentrate on the Pro
Bowlers Tour (where he was beloved) and Wide World assignments.
But Schenkel should be known for one more thing. Back in the mid-1960s, his
friendship with fellow Hoosier Tony Hulman helped ABC land the deal to carry,
first on a 72-hour-plus delay, the Indianapolis 500. Before Schenkel schmoozed
Hulman, only 500 qualifying was seen on TV.
I echo what much of tvnut has to say about Schenkel. I have no idea about his
role as the Giants voice for CBS since that was before my recollection. My guess
is that he must have been a darn good pro football commentator, given his
prominence as the voice for the flagship team of the NFL. He also tutored a
young Pat Summerall and locally in New York, Frank Gifford. And they turned out
pretty well in the booth for quite some time. In reading some old newspaper
accounts from the end of 1964 when he left CBS to go full time to ABC, it did
get a lot of press.
The one thing about Schenk was his pipes. His deep baritone on the calls of any
sporting event was peerless. His voice was as good as you'd want to hear. EV-ER.
As mentioned, he did anchor several Olympics for ABC, and ironically, Munich
1972, prior to the Olympic Village horror, he was at his peak. Smooth, folksy
and in control. What happened at the village was out of his control. It was no
longer a sporting event, but an unfolding news event. When the incident first
happened early Munich time, Schenkel was in bed, as he hosted the prime time
Olympics telecast (8 PM - 11 PM eastern) live from Munich (2 AM - 5 AM German
time). Arledge decided to keep him in bed. Jim McKay was on his way to the
Olympiastadion to cover the track & field events. Arledge told him to skip that
since what was going on in the Israeli apartment was wiping out all events until
further notice. He reported from ABC studios in Munich all day long (or at least
until their share of the satellite transmission cut out (I think live satellite
feeds were still time alloted in 1972) and then again in the prime time hours
our time.
Schenkel's absolute refusal to criticize college athletes caused a lot of TV
critics to razz on him relentlessly (in particular the Chicago Tribune's Gary
Deeb, who never had a kind word for Schenkel).
I have to admit, I was a fan of Schenkel then and now.
Sometime in 1972-1973 or thereabouts, Sports Illustrated ran afeature article on
Schenkel. I'll dig thru the vault and post a link to it, once I find it.
Here is the link to the article:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1086974/1/index.htm
Quote from timmy b on 11/07/09 at 07:59:02:
When the incident first happened early Munich time, Schenkel was in bed, as he
hosted the prime time Olympics telecast (8 PM - 11 PM eastern) live from Munich
(2 AM - 5 AM German time). Arledge decided to keep him in bed. Jim McKay was on
his way to the Olympiastadion to cover the track & field events. Arledge told
him to skip that since what was going on in the Israeli apartment was wiping out
all events until further notice.
According to Mc Kay's book The Real McKay, the incident occurred on a scheduled
off-day for McKay (the day between his gymnastics and track and field
assignments). McKay was actually relaxing in the hotel pool when he got word to
report to the studio (and he got ready so quickly that he still had his swim
trunks on underneath his clothes while he was on-air). Also, the scheduled
Olympic events were still going on when McKay first went on the air that day
which the book says was 1 pm Munich tune (7 am et). The IOC had originally
announced that the games would continue ("unbelievably" as McKay says in the
book). The IOC didn't suspend competition until later that day.
While searching through various newspaper archives, I also found a lot of
articles which criticized Schenkel for his pxp work on the NBA. I think
Schenkel's voice was somewhat of a monotone compared to other top announcers.
Also, I think he sometimes hesitated during in his pxp calls and could be slow
to identify players so it could seem that he lagged behind the action a bit.
Perhaps his style was better suited to sports like golf and bowling than faster
paced action of basketball or football. In any event, this thread makes me
interested in watching the 1971 Neb-Okl telecast which I recently DVRed from
ESPN Classic to see how he called that game.
Jim Spence, Roone Arledge's longtime #2 man, wrote a book that isn't terribly
flattering to Arledge on a personal level--no one denies his genius at
television production--and Spence seems to consider Schenkel Exhibit A. He
quotes Schenkel extensively on Arledge and ABC. Schenkel was probably the
biggest name in sportscasting in the early 1960s and did indeed get a lot of
flak for refusing to be critical of college football players, but as Spence also
made clear, Schenkel simply fit in better with an earlier era, before the
approach of Howard Cosell--who once said that he knew of no one who had an
unkind word to say about Schenkel. And, yes, the circumstances of Jackson's
departure from Monday Night Football and the addition of Frank Gifford ended up
helping Keith and hurting Chris--as did incredible overexposure. It did the
same to Curt Gowdy.
In addition to helping ABC get the Indy 500, Schenkel also introduced Arledge to
the top people at Churchill Downs, where he had broadcast the Kentucky Derby for
CBS. And that helped ABC get the Triple Crown.
I remember loving Gary Deeb's columns when I was a kid. Then I got a little
older and noticed that the vitriol got at least as tiresome as Schenkel's
Pollyanna approach.
Gary Deeb could be brutal, and he got considerable flak in his own right
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/64053
By JOHN OURAND
Staff writer
Published November 09, 2009 : Page 22
Much of the talk in the sports media world last fall centered on whether an
effective competitor would step up to compete with ESPN.
ESPN had just outbid Fox by $100 million to secure the rights to college
football's Bowl Championship Series through 2014, thanks mainly to its dual
revenue stream that has cable and satellite operators making a monthly payment
of more than $4 per subscriber for the channel.
At the time, some sports league executives were fearful that ESPN would become a
de facto monopoly that eventually would wind up driving the cost of sports
rights down.
If a competitor were to emerge, it would have to do so between 2011 and 2014,
when the TV deals for the NFL, MLB, NASCAR, NHL and MLS expire.
Yet a full year after ESPN scored the BCS rights, that national sports
competitor still has not developed, and most network and league executives
contacted by SportsBusiness Journal are skeptical that anyone will come forward
to compete head-to-head with ESPN.
Network and league executives are skeptical if
anyone will come forward to compete head-to-
head with ESPN."But I see lots of competition around the fringes for ESPN," said
one league executive.
That means ESPN should expect to see lots of competition from various entities,
including the broadcasters, national cable networks, regional sports networks
and league-owned networks.
Broadcasters have a multi-pronged approach for competing with ESPN for sports
rights, starting with using retransmission consent rules to charge cable
operators as much as $1 per month to carry their local stations (see story, page
1). Networks plan to use some of that money to compete with ESPN on sports
rights.
But ESPN could see competition from some national cable networks. Some of these
networks, like FX and Versus, have a surcharge clause in some of their contracts
with small- to midsized cable operators (ones not named Comcast or Time Warner
Cable). The surcharge gives the channels the right to charge an additional fee
if they pick up rights to high-profile sports programming such as the NFL or the
Olympics.
FX and Versus included these clauses in contracts when they were considering
bidding on the NFL's Thursday night package, according to several cable sources.
NFL Network ultimately was awarded the package, but the surcharge language
remains in many of the contracts.
ESPN and NFL Network tacked on surcharges when they first acquired NFL
programming; Versus charged cable and satellite operators a surcharge in 2005
when it obtained rights to the NHL for the first time.
In NFL Network's case, it increased rates from about 25 cents per subscriber to
about 70 cents. Versus pushed for a smaller surcharge amount, though it demanded
to be moved to better tiers. Cable operators that didn't agree to the surcharges
had the live games blacked out on their systems.
Versus has clauses in some of its distribution
contracts that call for higher fees from cable
systems should the network pick up rights
to high-profile sports programs.Other competition could come from the
league-owned networks, even though all of them insist that they are not set up
to be competitors to any of their broadcast partners.
"We've always said that we're not in competition with the rights holders," said
Tim Brosnan, MLB's executive vice president of business.
He pointed to MLB's postseason as an example. "If you look at our network right
now, it is nothing more than an infomercial for the Fox and Turner broadcasts,"
he said. "I say that in a generous way. We are a barker right now for our two
networks."
The NFL's head of new media, Brian Rolapp, sees his league network in similar
terms. "I don't really see a competition," he said. "I don't see anybody
complaining about the ratings. It's all good for the football fan."
Others, however, believe the channels have the potential to be strong
competitors.
"You can see college conferences and league-owned networks continuing to create
new packages and new opportunities for networks to bid on their games," one
cable source said. "You can slice and dice this in such a way that everything
doesn't have to go to a mega national sports network like ESPN."
Who will step up?
Broadcasters: They still command the biggest audiences and still have deep
pockets. As CBS and Fox begin charging cable operators for retransmission
consent, they will have more money to bid on sports rights.
Turner Sports: David Levy rose through Turner's sports division and now
oversees all of Turner's sales and distribution. Does that mean TBS and TNT will
be more likely to increase their sports portfolio beyond MLB, NBA and NASCAR?
Cable networks: USA has retreated from sports; FX doesn't hold any sports
rights; and Spike only dabbles in it. But they all have dual revenue streams
that are key to bidding for sports rights. Could one of them step up and pick up
a TV package?
All-sports networks: Other than ESPN, Versus is the only player in this space
and given the size and scope of its owner, Comcast, it has enough money to
afford just about any rights package. Meanwhile, News Corp.'s Chase Carey said
Fox isn't planning to
League-owned networks: Leagues own their own rights; leagues own their own
networks. Sure, they don't want to give up on the rights fees that networks are
paying. But it makes sense for them to grow their channels through packages of
live games.
While John Skipper, ESPN executive vice president, sees more competition in the
sports media space, he says the added competitors are not causing ESPN to change
the programming strategy it has employed for the past several years.
That means ESPN still plans to bid aggressively on high-profile sports rights
that encompass cable, broadband and wireless rights.
"We feel like the most important couple of things for us to do are to acquire
rights that allow us to move content around," Skipper said. "We don't buy games;
we buy content — both the games themselves on multiple platforms, the highlights
around them, and the rights to do other shows."
As Skipper picks up rights, he will make a renewed push to convince leagues that
the difference between ESPN and ESPN2 is diminishing. ESPN2 still lags ESPN
significantly in ratings, but Skipper says the difference is becoming lessened
as ESPN puts higher quality programming on ESPN2.
ESPN's affiliate team also has been trying to get the two channels placed next
to each other on cable and satellite systems.
"My goal is to have that be 48 hours of ESPN," Skipper said. "We used to say
that we'd never move `SportsCenter' to ESPN2. Now, we do sometimes."
With so many major sports rights coming due before 2014, Skipper says ESPN will
have to decide which rights to bid on and which to ignore. But he said that does
not represent a change from the past several years.
"We already have to pick and choose," Skipper said. "There are lots of things
that we'd like to have that we don't have."
He specifically mentioned baseball's postseason as something that is
"disappointing, in some ways, that we're not there."